From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] btrfs: implement a nowait option for tree searches
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:14:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220926091440.GA1198392@falcondesktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:27:42PM -0700, Stefan Roesch wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
>
> For NOWAIT IOCB's we'll need a way to tell search to not wait on locks
> or anything. Accomplish this by adding a path->nowait flag that will
> use trylocks and skip reading of metadata, returning -EAGAIN in either
> of these cases. For now we only need this for reads, so only the read
> side is handled. Add an ASSERT() to catch anybody trying to use this
> for writes so they know they'll have to implement the write side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/locking.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/locking.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index ebfa35fe1c38..71b238364939 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -1447,6 +1447,11 @@ read_block_for_search(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *p,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (p->nowait) {
> + free_extent_buffer(tmp);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> if (unlock_up)
> btrfs_unlock_up_safe(p, level + 1);
>
> @@ -1467,6 +1472,8 @@ read_block_for_search(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *p,
> ret = -EAGAIN;
>
> goto out;
> + } else if (p->nowait) {
> + return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> if (unlock_up) {
> @@ -1634,7 +1641,13 @@ static struct extent_buffer *btrfs_search_slot_get_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
> * We don't know the level of the root node until we actually
> * have it read locked
> */
> - b = btrfs_read_lock_root_node(root);
> + if (p->nowait) {
> + b = btrfs_try_read_lock_root_node(root);
> + if (IS_ERR(b))
> + return b;
> + } else {
> + b = btrfs_read_lock_root_node(root);
> + }
> level = btrfs_header_level(b);
> if (level > write_lock_level)
> goto out;
> @@ -1910,6 +1923,13 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
> WARN_ON(p->nodes[0] != NULL);
> BUG_ON(!cow && ins_len);
>
> + /*
> + * For now only allow nowait for read only operations. There's no
> + * strict reason why we can't, we just only need it for reads so I'm
> + * only implementing it for reads right now.
> + */
> + ASSERT(!p->nowait || !cow);
> +
> if (ins_len < 0) {
> lowest_unlock = 2;
>
> @@ -1936,7 +1956,12 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
>
> if (p->need_commit_sem) {
> ASSERT(p->search_commit_root);
> - down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
> + if (p->nowait) {
> + if (!down_read_trylock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem))
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + } else {
> + down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
> + }
> }
>
> again:
> @@ -2082,7 +2107,15 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
> btrfs_tree_lock(b);
> p->locks[level] = BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK;
> } else {
> - btrfs_tree_read_lock(b);
> + if (p->nowait) {
> + if (!btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(b)) {
> + free_extent_buffer(b);
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + goto done;
> + }
> + } else {
> + btrfs_tree_read_lock(b);
> + }
> p->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
> }
> p->nodes[level] = b;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index df8c99c99df9..ca59ba6421a9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ struct btrfs_path {
> * header (ie. sizeof(struct btrfs_item) is not included).
> */
> unsigned int search_for_extension:1;
> + unsigned int nowait:1;
> };
> #define BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_ITEM_SIZE(r) ((BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(r->fs_info) >> 4) - \
> sizeof(struct btrfs_item))
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> index 9063072b399b..d6c88922d3e2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,29 @@ struct extent_buffer *btrfs_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root)
> return eb;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Loop around taking references on and locking the root node of the tree in
> + * nowait mode until we end up with a lock on the root node or returning to
> + * avoid blocking.
> + *
> + * Return: root extent buffer with read lock held or -EWOULDBLOCK.
> + */
> +struct extent_buffer *btrfs_try_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root)
> +{
> + struct extent_buffer *eb;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + eb = btrfs_root_node(root);
> + if (!btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(eb))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
There's a leak of the extent buffer here.
This fixes it up:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 9d53bcfb6d9b..0eab3cb274a1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -298,8 +298,10 @@ struct extent_buffer *btrfs_try_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root)
while (1) {
eb = btrfs_root_node(root);
- if (!btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(eb))
+ if (!btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(eb)) {
+ free_extent_buffer(eb);
return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
+ }
if (eb == root->node)
break;
btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
Thanks.
> + if (eb == root->node)
> + break;
> + btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
> + free_extent_buffer(eb);
> + }
> + return eb;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * DREW locks
> * ==========
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.h b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
> index ab268be09bb5..490c7a79e995 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ int btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
> int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
> struct extent_buffer *btrfs_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root);
> struct extent_buffer *btrfs_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root);
> +struct extent_buffer *btrfs_try_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
> static inline void btrfs_assert_tree_write_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb)
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-12 19:27 [PATCH v3 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] mm: export balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags() Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] btrfs: implement a nowait option for tree searches Stefan Roesch
2022-09-26 9:14 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-09-26 10:55 ` David Sterba
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] btrfs: make can_nocow_extent nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] btrfs: add the ability to use NO_FLUSH for data reservations Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] btrfs: add btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] btrfs: make btrfs_check_nocow_lock nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] btrfs: make prepare_pages " Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] btrfs: make lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need " Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] btrfs: plumb NOWAIT through the write path Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] btrfs: make balance_dirty_pages nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] btrfs: assert nowait mode is not used for some btree search functions Stefan Roesch
2022-09-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] btrfs: enable nowait async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-09-13 9:47 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support " Filipe Manana
2022-09-20 12:25 ` David Sterba
2022-09-21 10:19 ` David Sterba
2022-09-21 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220926091440.GA1198392@falcondesktop \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox