From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Anuj Gupta <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v10 6/7] block: extend functionality to map bvec iterator
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:40:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:06:09PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Extend blk_rq_map_user_iov so that it can handle bvec iterator.
> It maps the pages from bvec iterator into a bio and place the bio into
> request.
>
> This helper will be used by nvme for uring-passthrough path when IO is
> done using pre-mapped buffers.
Can we avoid duplicating some of the checks? Something like the below
incremental patch. Note that this now also allows the copy path for
all kinds of iov_iters, but as the copy from/to iter code is safe
and the sanity check was just or the map path that should be fine.
It's best split into a prep patch, though.
---
diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c
index a1aa8dacb02bc..c51de30767403 100644
--- a/block/blk-map.c
+++ b/block/blk-map.c
@@ -549,26 +549,16 @@ int blk_rq_append_bio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_append_bio);
/* Prepare bio for passthrough IO given ITER_BVEC iter */
-static int blk_rq_map_user_bvec(struct request *rq, const struct iov_iter *iter,
- bool *copy)
+static int blk_rq_map_user_bvec(struct request *rq, const struct iov_iter *iter)
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
- size_t nr_iter, nr_segs, i;
- struct bio *bio = NULL;
- struct bio_vec *bv, *bvecs, *bvprvp = NULL;
+ size_t nr_iter = iov_iter_count(iter);
+ size_t nr_segs = iter->nr_segs;
+ struct bio_vec *bvecs, *bvprvp = NULL;
struct queue_limits *lim = &q->limits;
unsigned int nsegs = 0, bytes = 0;
- unsigned long align = q->dma_pad_mask | queue_dma_alignment(q);
-
- /* see if we need to copy pages due to any weird situation */
- if (blk_queue_may_bounce(q))
- goto out_copy;
- else if (iov_iter_alignment(iter) & align)
- goto out_copy;
- /* virt-alignment gap is checked anyway down, so avoid extra loop here */
-
- nr_iter = iov_iter_count(iter);
- nr_segs = iter->nr_segs;
+ struct bio *bio;
+ size_t i;
if (!nr_iter || (nr_iter >> SECTOR_SHIFT) > queue_max_hw_sectors(q))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -586,14 +576,15 @@ static int blk_rq_map_user_bvec(struct request *rq, const struct iov_iter *iter,
/* loop to perform a bunch of sanity checks */
bvecs = (struct bio_vec *)iter->bvec;
for (i = 0; i < nr_segs; i++) {
- bv = &bvecs[i];
+ struct bio_vec *bv = &bvecs[i];
+
/*
* If the queue doesn't support SG gaps and adding this
* offset would create a gap, fallback to copy.
*/
if (bvprvp && bvec_gap_to_prev(lim, bvprvp, bv->bv_offset)) {
bio_map_put(bio);
- goto out_copy;
+ return -EREMOTEIO;
}
/* check full condition */
if (nsegs >= nr_segs || bytes > UINT_MAX - bv->bv_len)
@@ -611,9 +602,6 @@ static int blk_rq_map_user_bvec(struct request *rq, const struct iov_iter *iter,
put_bio:
bio_map_put(bio);
return -EINVAL;
-out_copy:
- *copy = true;
- return 0;
}
/**
@@ -635,33 +623,35 @@ int blk_rq_map_user_iov(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
struct rq_map_data *map_data,
const struct iov_iter *iter, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
- bool copy = false;
+ bool copy = false, map_bvec = false;
unsigned long align = q->dma_pad_mask | queue_dma_alignment(q);
struct bio *bio = NULL;
struct iov_iter i;
int ret = -EINVAL;
- if (iov_iter_is_bvec(iter)) {
- ret = blk_rq_map_user_bvec(rq, iter, ©);
- if (ret != 0)
- goto fail;
- if (copy)
- goto do_copy;
- return ret;
- }
- if (!iter_is_iovec(iter))
- goto fail;
-
if (map_data)
copy = true;
else if (blk_queue_may_bounce(q))
copy = true;
else if (iov_iter_alignment(iter) & align)
copy = true;
+ else if (iov_iter_is_bvec(iter))
+ map_bvec = true;
+ else if (!iter_is_iovec(iter))
+ copy = true;
else if (queue_virt_boundary(q))
copy = queue_virt_boundary(q) & iov_iter_gap_alignment(iter);
-do_copy:
+ if (map_bvec) {
+ ret = blk_rq_map_user_bvec(rq, iter);
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
+ if (ret != -EREMOTEIO)
+ goto fail;
+ /* fall back to copying the data on limits mismatches */
+ copy = true;
+ }
+
i = *iter;
do {
if (copy)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220927174622epcas5p1685c0f97a7ee2ee13ba25f5fb58dff00@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 0/7] Fixed-buffer for uring-cmd/passthru Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174626epcas5p4002acda6f0578ee314ee5e611b8d6662@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 1/7] io_uring: add io_uring_cmd_import_fixed Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174628epcas5p21beda845f26eedeb538cb67e286954d4@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 2/7] io_uring: introduce fixed buffer support for io_uring_cmd Kanchan Joshi
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174631epcas5p12cd6ffbd7dad819b0af75733ce6cdd2c@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 3/7] nvme: refactor nvme_add_user_metadata Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-28 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-29 11:28 ` Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174633epcas5p4d492bdebde981e2c019e30c47cf00869@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 4/7] nvme: refactor nvme_alloc_request Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-28 17:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-29 11:30 ` Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174636epcas5p49008baa36dcbf2f61c25ba89c4707c0c@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 5/7] block: factor out bio_map_get helper Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-28 17:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-28 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-28 17:53 ` Jens Axboe
2022-09-29 11:34 ` Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174639epcas5p22b46aed144d81d82b2a9b9de586808ac@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 6/7] block: extend functionality to map bvec iterator Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-28 17:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-09-29 11:33 ` Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20220927174642epcas5p1dafa31776d4eb8180e18f149ed25640c@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-09-27 17:36 ` [PATCH for-next v10 7/7] nvme: wire up fixed buffer support for nvme passthrough Kanchan Joshi
2022-09-28 17:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-29 11:36 ` Anuj Gupta
2022-09-28 14:28 ` [PATCH for-next v10 0/7] Fixed-buffer for uring-cmd/passthru Jens Axboe
2022-09-28 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-28 17:13 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox