From: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: always prep_async for drain requests
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:59:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Drain requests all go through io_drain_req, which has a quick exit in case
there is nothing pending (ie the drain is not useful). In that case it can
run the issue the request immediately.
However for safety it queues it through task work.
The problem is that in this case the request is run asynchronously, but
the async work has not been prepared through io_req_prep_async.
This has not been a problem up to now, as the task work always would run
before returning to userspace, and so the user would not have a chance to
race with it.
However - with IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN - this is no longer the case and
the work might be defered, giving userspace a chance to change data being
referred to in the request.
Instead _always_ prep_async for drain requests, which is simpler anyway
and removes this issue.
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
Signed-off-by: Dylan Yudaken <[email protected]>
---
Hi,
Worth pointing out in discussion with Pavel that we considered just
removing the fast path in io_drain_req. That felt like more of an invasive
change as it can add an extra kmalloc + io_prep_async_link(), but perhaps
you feel that is a better approach.
I'll send out a liburing test shortly.
Dylan
io_uring/io_uring.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 0a4efada9b3c..db623b3185c8 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1765,17 +1765,12 @@ static __cold void io_drain_req(struct io_kiocb *req)
}
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
- ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
- if (ret) {
-fail:
- io_req_defer_failed(req, ret);
- return;
- }
io_prep_async_link(req);
de = kmalloc(sizeof(*de), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!de) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto fail;
+ io_req_defer_failed(req, ret);
+ return;
}
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
@@ -2048,13 +2043,16 @@ static void io_queue_sqe_fallback(struct io_kiocb *req)
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_HARDLINK;
req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
io_req_defer_failed(req, req->cqe.res);
- } else if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active)) {
- io_drain_req(req);
} else {
int ret = io_req_prep_async(req);
- if (unlikely(ret))
+ if (unlikely(ret)) {
io_req_defer_failed(req, ret);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(req->ctx->drain_active))
+ io_drain_req(req);
else
io_queue_iowq(req, NULL);
}
base-commit: b00c51ef8f72ced0965d021a291b98ff822c5337
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 10:59 Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2023-01-27 13:46 ` [PATCH] io_uring: always prep_async for drain requests Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox