From: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF Topic] Non-block IO
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 23:30:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CGME20230210180226epcas5p1bd2e1150de067f8af61de2bbf571594d@epcas5p1.samsung.com
is getting more common than it used to be.
NVMe is no longer tied to block storage. Command sets in NVMe 2.0 spec
opened an excellent way to present non-block interfaces to the Host. ZNS
and KV came along with it, and some new command sets are emerging.
OTOH, Kernel IO advances historically centered around the block IO path.
Passthrough IO path existed, but it stayed far from all the advances, be
it new features or performance.
Current state & discussion points:
---------------------------------
Status-quo changed in the recent past with the new passthrough path (ng
char interface + io_uring command). Feature parity does not exist, but
performance parity does.
Adoption draws asks. I propose a session covering a few voices and
finding a path-forward for some ideas too.
1. Command cancellation: while NVMe mandatorily supports the abort
command, we do not have a way to trigger that from user-space. There
are ways to go about it (with or without the uring-cancel interface) but
not without certain tradeoffs. It will be good to discuss the choices in
person.
2. Cgroups: works for only block dev at the moment. Are there outright
objections to extending this to char-interface IO?
3. DMA cost: is high in presence of IOMMU. Keith posted the work[1],
with block IO path, last year. I imagine plumbing to get a bit simpler
with passthrough-only support. But what are the other things that must
be sorted out to have progress on moving DMA cost out of the fast path?
4. Direct NVMe queues - will there be interest in having io_uring
managed NVMe queues? Sort of a new ring, for which I/O is destaged from
io_uring SQE to NVMe SQE without having to go through intermediate
constructs (i.e., bio/request). Hopefully,that can further amp up the
efficiency of IO.
5. <anything else that might be of interest to folks>
I hope to send some code/PoC to discuss the stuff better.
[1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/[email protected]/
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230210180226epcas5p1bd2e1150de067f8af61de2bbf571594d@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2023-02-10 18:00 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2023-02-10 18:18 ` [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF Topic] Non-block IO Bart Van Assche
2023-02-10 19:34 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-02-13 20:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-02-10 19:47 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-14 10:33 ` John Garry
2023-02-10 19:53 ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-13 11:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-11 22:48 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-04-11 22:53 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-11 23:28 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-04-12 2:12 ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-12 2:33 ` Ming Lei
2023-04-12 13:26 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-04-12 13:47 ` Ming Lei
2023-02-10 20:07 ` Clay Mayers
2023-02-11 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2023-02-11 12:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-28 16:05 ` John Meneghini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox