public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	asml.silence@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, leit@fb.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	sagi@grimberg.me, hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org,
	ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring: Pass the whole sqe to commands
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:46:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421121605.GA30924@green245> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421114440.3343473-1-leitao@debian.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 744 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 04:44:37AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>These three patches prepare for the sock support in the io_uring cmd, as
>described in the following RFC:
>
>	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230406144330.1932798-1-leitao@debian.org/
>
>Since the support linked above depends on other refactors, such as the sock
>ioctl() sock refactor[1], I would like to start integrating patches that have
>consensus and can bring value right now.  This will also reduce the patchset
>size later.
>
>Regarding to these three patches, they are simple changes that turn
>io_uring cmd subsystem more flexible (by passing the whole SQE to the
>command), and cleaning up an unnecessary compile check.

Reviewed-by: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-21 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20230421114703epcas5p37cd0ddb29674d8f3d5fe2f1fa494d1f0@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2023-04-21 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring: Pass the whole sqe to commands Breno Leitao
2023-04-21 11:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] io_uring: Create a helper to return the SQE size Breno Leitao
2023-04-24  7:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-21 11:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] io_uring: Pass whole sqe to commands Breno Leitao
2023-04-24  7:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-21 11:44   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] io_uring: Remove unnecessary BUILD_BUG_ON Breno Leitao
2023-04-24  7:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-04-28 17:27     ` Jens Axboe
2023-04-21 12:16   ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2023-04-28 17:28   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] io_uring: Pass the whole sqe to commands Jens Axboe
2023-04-30 14:39     ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230421121605.GA30924@green245 \
    --to=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=leit@fb.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox