public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
To: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
	Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] io_uring: add support for getdents
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 09:15:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 08:27:53PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 03:14:52PM +0900:
> > > We already pass a struct dir_context to ->iterate_shared(), so we
> > > have a simple way to add context specific flags down the filesystem
> > > from iterate_dir(). This is similar to the iocb for file data IO
> > > that contains the flags field that holds the IOCB_NOWAIT context for
> > > io_uring based IO. So the infrastructure to plumb it all the way
> > > down the fs implementation of ->iterate_shared is already there.
> > 
> > Sure, that sounds like a good approach that isn't breaking the API (not
> > breaking iterate/iterate_shared implementations that don't look at the
> > flags and allowing the fs that want to look at it to do so)
> 
> Hmm actually I said that, but io_getdents() needs to know if the flag
> will be honored or not (if it will be honored, we can call this when
> issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK but if we're not sure the fs handles
> it then we risk blocking)

See the new FMODE_DIO_PARALLEL_WRITE flag for triggering filesystem
specific non-blocking io_uring behaviour....

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
[email protected]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-30 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-22  8:40 [PATCH RFC 0/2] io_uring: add getdents support, take 2 Dominique Martinet
2023-04-22  8:40 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] fs: split off vfs_getdents function of getdents64 syscall Dominique Martinet
2023-04-22 10:34   ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-22  8:40 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] io_uring: add support for getdents Dominique Martinet
2023-04-23 22:40   ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-23 23:43     ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-24  7:29       ` Clay Harris
2023-04-24  8:41         ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-24  9:20           ` Clay Harris
2023-04-24 10:55             ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-28  5:06       ` Dave Chinner
2023-04-28  6:14         ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-28 11:27           ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-30 23:15             ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-04-29  8:07           ` Dominique Martinet
2023-04-30 23:32             ` Dave Chinner
2023-05-01  0:49               ` Dominique Martinet
2023-05-01  7:16                 ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox