From: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/7] net: split off __napi_busy_poll from napi_busy_poll
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 21:15:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, 31 May 2023 12:16:50 -0700 Stefan Roesch wrote:
> > This will conflict with:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c857946a4e26
> >
> > :( Not sure what to do about it..
> >
> > Maybe we can merge a simpler version to unblock io-uring (just add
> > need_resched() to your loop_end callback and you'll get the same
> > behavior). Refactor in net-next in parallel. Then once trees converge
> > do simple a cleanup and call the _rcu version?
>
> Jakub, I can certainly call need_resched() in the loop_end callback, but
> isn't there a potential race? need_resched() in the loop_end callback
> might not return true, but the need_resched() call in napi_busy_poll
> does?
need_resched() is best effort. It gets added to potentially long
execution paths and loops. Extra single round thru the loop won't
make a difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 21:17 [PATCH v13 0/7] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Stefan Roesch
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] net: split off __napi_busy_poll from napi_busy_poll Stefan Roesch
2023-05-31 17:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-05 17:47 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-06-05 18:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2023-06-01 4:15 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-06-02 4:12 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-06-02 4:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] net: introduce napi_busy_loop_rcu() Stefan Roesch
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2023-05-31 17:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-05 17:45 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] io-uring: move io_wait_queue definition to header file Stefan Roesch
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] io-uring: add napi busy poll support Stefan Roesch
2023-05-19 1:26 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-19 23:11 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-05-19 9:53 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-19 23:17 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] io-uring: add sqpoll support for napi busy poll Stefan Roesch
2023-05-19 0:11 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-19 1:13 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-19 23:29 ` Stefan Roesch
2023-05-19 4:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] io_uring: add register/unregister napi function Stefan Roesch
2023-05-19 1:30 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-18 21:17 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] io_uring: add prefer busy poll to register and unregister napi api Stefan Roesch
2023-05-19 1:31 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] io_uring: add napi busy polling support Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox