public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] io_uring: add support for futex wake and wait
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:51:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 06:47:01PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Add support for FUTEX_WAKE/WAIT primitives.
> 
> IORING_OP_FUTEX_WAKE is mix of FUTEX_WAKE and FUTEX_WAKE_BITSET, as
> it does support passing in a bitset.
> 
> Similary, IORING_OP_FUTEX_WAIT is a mix of FUTEX_WAIT and
> FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET.
> 
> FUTEX_WAKE is straight forward, as we can always just do those inline.
> FUTEX_WAIT will queue the futex with an appropriate callback, and
> that callback will in turn post a CQE when it has triggered.
> 
> Cancelations are supported, both from the application point-of-view,
> but also to be able to cancel pending waits if the ring exits before
> all events have occurred.
> 
> This is just the barebones wait/wake support. PI or REQUEUE support is
> not added at this point, unclear if we might look into that later.
> 
> Likewise, explicit timeouts are not supported either. It is expected
> that users that need timeouts would do so via the usual io_uring
> mechanism to do that using linked timeouts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

I'm not sure I'm qualified to review this :/ I really don't know
anything about how io-uring works. And the above doesn't really begin to
explain things.


> +static void io_futex_wake_fn(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
> +{
> +	struct io_futex_data *ifd = container_of(q, struct io_futex_data, q);
> +	struct io_kiocb *req = ifd->req;
> +
> +	__futex_unqueue(q);
> +	smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
> +
> +	io_req_set_res(req, 0, 0);
> +	req->io_task_work.func = io_futex_complete;
> +	io_req_task_work_add(req);
> +}

I'm noting the WARN from futex_wake_mark() went walk-about.

Perhaps something like so?


diff --git a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
index ba01b9408203..07758d48d5db 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/waitwake.c
@@ -106,20 +106,11 @@
  * double_lock_hb() and double_unlock_hb(), respectively.
  */
 
-/*
- * The hash bucket lock must be held when this is called.
- * Afterwards, the futex_q must not be accessed. Callers
- * must ensure to later call wake_up_q() for the actual
- * wakeups to occur.
- */
-void futex_wake_mark(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
+bool __futex_wake_mark(struct futex_q *q)
 {
-	struct task_struct *p = q->task;
-
 	if (WARN(q->pi_state || q->rt_waiter, "refusing to wake PI futex\n"))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
-	get_task_struct(p);
 	__futex_unqueue(q);
 	/*
 	 * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as q->lock_ptr = NULL
@@ -130,6 +121,26 @@ void futex_wake_mark(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
 	 */
 	smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
 
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The hash bucket lock must be held when this is called.
+ * Afterwards, the futex_q must not be accessed. Callers
+ * must ensure to later call wake_up_q() for the actual
+ * wakeups to occur.
+ */
+void futex_wake_mark(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
+{
+	struct task_struct *p = q->task;
+
+	get_task_struct(p);
+
+	if (!__futex_wake_mark(q)) {
+		put_task_struct(p);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've released
 	 * the hb->lock.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-12  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-12  0:46 [PATCHSET 0/7] Add io_uring futex/futexv support Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] futex: abstract out futex_op_to_flags() helper Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  8:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-12 14:59     ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] futex: factor out the futex wake handling Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  8:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-12 15:02     ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] io_uring: add support for futex wake and wait Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  8:51   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-07-12 15:05     ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] futex: add wake_data to struct futex_q Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] futex: make futex_parse_waitv() available as a helper Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  9:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-12 15:06     ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] futex: make the vectored futex operations available Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  0:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] io_uring: add futex waitv Jens Axboe
2023-07-12  9:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-12 15:10     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230712085116.GC3100107@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox