From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] iomap: treat a write through cache the same as FUA
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 10:16:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Whether we have a write back cache and are using FUA or don't have
a write back cache at all is the same situation. Treat them the same.
This makes the IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA name a bit misleading, as we have
two cases that provide stable writes:
1) Volatile write cache with FUA writes
2) Normal write without a volatile write cache
Rename that flag to IOMAP_DIO_STABLE_WRITE to make that clearer, and
update some of the FUA comments as well.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
index c654612b24e5..17b695b0e9d6 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
* iomap.h:
*/
#define IOMAP_DIO_INLINE_COMP (1 << 27)
-#define IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA (1 << 28)
+#define IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_THROUGH (1 << 28)
#define IOMAP_DIO_NEED_SYNC (1 << 29)
#define IOMAP_DIO_WRITE (1 << 30)
#define IOMAP_DIO_DIRTY (1 << 31)
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void iomap_dio_zero(const struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio,
/*
* Figure out the bio's operation flags from the dio request, the
* mapping, and whether or not we want FUA. Note that we can end up
- * clearing the WRITE_FUA flag in the dio request.
+ * clearing the WRITE_THROUGH flag in the dio request.
*/
static inline blk_opf_t iomap_dio_bio_opflags(struct iomap_dio *dio,
const struct iomap *iomap, bool use_fua)
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline blk_opf_t iomap_dio_bio_opflags(struct iomap_dio *dio,
if (use_fua)
opflags |= REQ_FUA;
else
- dio->flags &= ~IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA;
+ dio->flags &= ~IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_THROUGH;
return opflags;
}
@@ -276,11 +276,13 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
* Use a FUA write if we need datasync semantics, this is a pure
* data IO that doesn't require any metadata updates (including
* after IO completion such as unwritten extent conversion) and
- * the underlying device supports FUA. This allows us to avoid
- * cache flushes on IO completion.
+ * the underlying device either supports FUA or doesn't have
+ * a volatile write cache. This allows us to avoid cache flushes
+ * on IO completion.
*/
if (!(iomap->flags & (IOMAP_F_SHARED|IOMAP_F_DIRTY)) &&
- (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA) && bdev_fua(iomap->bdev))
+ (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_THROUGH) &&
+ (bdev_fua(iomap->bdev) || !bdev_write_cache(iomap->bdev)))
use_fua = true;
}
@@ -560,12 +562,15 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
/*
* For datasync only writes, we optimistically try
- * using FUA for this IO. Any non-FUA write that
- * occurs will clear this flag, hence we know before
- * completion whether a cache flush is necessary.
+ * using WRITE_THROUGH for this IO. Stable writes are
+ * either FUA with a write cache, or a normal write to
+ * a device without a volatile write cache. For the
+ * former, Any non-FUA write that occurs will clear this
+ * flag, hence we know before completion whether a cache
+ * flush is necessary.
*/
if (!(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_SYNC))
- dio->flags |= IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA;
+ dio->flags |= IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_THROUGH;
}
/*
@@ -627,10 +632,10 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
iomap_dio_set_error(dio, ret);
/*
- * If all the writes we issued were FUA, we don't need to flush the
+ * If all the writes we issued were stable, we don't need to flush the
* cache on IO completion. Clear the sync flag for this case.
*/
- if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA)
+ if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_THROUGH)
dio->flags &= ~IOMAP_DIO_NEED_SYNC;
WRITE_ONCE(iocb->private, dio->submit.poll_bio);
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 16:16 [PATCHSET v5 0/9] Improve async iomap DIO performance Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/9] iomap: cleanup up iomap_dio_bio_end_io() Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] iomap: add IOMAP_DIO_INLINE_COMP Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-07-21 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/9] iomap: treat a write through cache the same as FUA Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-21 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-21 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 4/9] iomap: completed polled IO inline Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 5/9] iomap: only set iocb->private for polled bio Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 6/9] fs: add IOCB flags related to passing back dio completions Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-21 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:43 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 7/9] io_uring/rw: add write support for IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 8/9] iomap: support IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [PATCH 9/9] iomap: use an unsigned type for IOMAP_DIO_* defines Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-24 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox