public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Hao Xu <hao.xu@linux.dev>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>, Clay Harris <bugs@claycon.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:22:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230726-reinreden-packten-e7ab9aff296a@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726102603.155522-1-hao.xu@linux.dev>

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:25:56PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> From: Hao Xu <howeyxu@tencent.com>
> 
> This series adds lseek for io_uring, the motivation to import this
> syscall is in previous io_uring getdents patchset, we lack a way to
> rewind the file cursor when it goes to the end of file. Another reason
> is lseek is a common syscall, it's good for coding consistency when
> users use io_uring as their main loop.

While I understand this it is a time consuming review to make sure
things work correctly. So before we get this thing going we better get
getdents correct first.

> 
> Patch 1 is code clean for iomap
> Patch 2 adds IOMAP_NOWAIT logic for iomap lseek
> Patch 3 adds a nowait parameter to for IOMAP_NOWAIT control
> Patch 4 adds llseek_nowait() for file_operations so that specific
>         filesystem can implement it for nowait lseek
> Patch 5 adds llseek_nowait() implementation for xfs
> Patch 6 adds a new vfs wrapper for io_uring use
> Patch 7 is the main io_uring lseek implementation
> 
> Note, this series depends on the previous io_uring getdents series.
> 
> This is marked RFC since there is (at least) an issue to be discussed:
> The work in this series is mainly to reslove a problem that the current
> llseek() in struct file_operations doesn't have a place to deliver
> nowait info, and adding an argument to it results in update for llseek
> implementation of all filesystems (35 functions), so here I introduce
> a new llseek_nowait() as a workaround.

My intuition would be to update all filesystems. Adding new inode
operations always starts as a temporary thing and then we live with two
different methods for the next years or possibly forever.

But it'd be good to hear what others think.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-26 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-26 10:25 [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/7] iomap: merge iomap_seek_hole() and iomap_seek_data() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:50   ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:10     ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: add nowait support for xfs_seek_iomap_begin() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 21:55   ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 22:14     ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-27 12:17       ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] add nowait parameter for iomap_seek() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:01   ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] add llseek_nowait() for struct file_operations Hao Xu
2023-07-27 13:25   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] add llseek_nowait support for xfs Hao Xu
2023-07-26 22:14   ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-27 12:26     ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] add vfs_lseek_nowait() Hao Xu
2023-07-26 10:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] add lseek for io_uring Hao Xu
2023-07-26 13:22 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-07-27 12:30 ` [RFC 0/7] io_uring lseek Hao Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230726-reinreden-packten-e7ab9aff296a@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bugs@claycon.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.xu@linux.dev \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shr@fb.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox