From: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Dave Chinner <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>, Clay Harris <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: add support for getdents
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:18:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230731-jawohl-schafsfell-0a890454b2af@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:02:25AM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 7/27/23 22:27, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:51:19PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > On 7/26/23 23:00, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 09:21:10PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> > > > > From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> > > > >
> > > > > This add support for getdents64 to io_uring, acting exactly like the
> > > > > syscall: the directory is iterated from it's current's position as
> > > > > stored in the file struct, and the file's position is updated exactly as
> > > > > if getdents64 had been called.
> > > > >
> > > > > For filesystems that support NOWAIT in iterate_shared(), try to use it
> > > > > first; if a user already knows the filesystem they use do not support
> > > > > nowait they can force async through IOSQE_ASYNC in the sqe flags,
> > > > > avoiding the need to bounce back through a useless EAGAIN return.
> > > > >
> > > > > Co-developed-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 7 +++++
> > > > > io_uring/fs.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > io_uring/fs.h | 3 ++
> > > > > io_uring/opdef.c | 8 +++++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> > > > > index 36f9c73082de..b200b2600622 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> > > > > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct io_uring_sqe {
> > > > > __u32 xattr_flags;
> > > > > __u32 msg_ring_flags;
> > > > > __u32 uring_cmd_flags;
> > > > > + __u32 getdents_flags;
> > > > > };
> > > > > __u64 user_data; /* data to be passed back at completion time */
> > > > > /* pack this to avoid bogus arm OABI complaints */
> > > > > @@ -235,6 +236,7 @@ enum io_uring_op {
> > > > > IORING_OP_URING_CMD,
> > > > > IORING_OP_SEND_ZC,
> > > > > IORING_OP_SENDMSG_ZC,
> > > > > + IORING_OP_GETDENTS,
> > > > > /* this goes last, obviously */
> > > > > IORING_OP_LAST,
> > > > > @@ -273,6 +275,11 @@ enum io_uring_op {
> > > > > */
> > > > > #define SPLICE_F_FD_IN_FIXED (1U << 31) /* the last bit of __u32 */
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * sqe->getdents_flags
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +#define IORING_GETDENTS_REWIND (1U << 0)
> > > > > +
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * POLL_ADD flags. Note that since sqe->poll_events is the flag space, the
> > > > > * command flags for POLL_ADD are stored in sqe->len.
> > > > > diff --git a/io_uring/fs.c b/io_uring/fs.c
> > > > > index f6a69a549fd4..480f25677fed 100644
> > > > > --- a/io_uring/fs.c
> > > > > +++ b/io_uring/fs.c
> > > > > @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ struct io_link {
> > > > > int flags;
> > > > > };
> > > > > +struct io_getdents {
> > > > > + struct file *file;
> > > > > + struct linux_dirent64 __user *dirent;
> > > > > + unsigned int count;
> > > > > + int flags;
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > int io_renameat_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct io_rename *ren = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_rename);
> > > > > @@ -291,3 +298,51 @@ void io_link_cleanup(struct io_kiocb *req)
> > > > > putname(sl->oldpath);
> > > > > putname(sl->newpath);
> > > > > }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int io_getdents_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct io_getdents *gd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_getdents);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (READ_ONCE(sqe->off) != 0)
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + gd->dirent = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
> > > > > + gd->count = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int io_getdents(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct io_getdents *gd = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_getdents);
> > > > > + struct file *file = req->file;
> > > > > + unsigned long getdents_flags = 0;
> > > > > + bool force_nonblock = issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
> > > >
> > > > Hm, I'm not sure what exactly the rules are for IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK.
> > > > But to point this out:
> > > >
> > > > vfs_getdents()
> > > > -> iterate_dir()
> > > > {
> > > > if (shared)
> > > > res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
> > > > else
> > > > res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > which means you can still end up sleeping here before you go into a
> > > > filesystem that does actually support non-waiting getdents. So if you
> > > > have concurrent operations that grab inode lock (touch, mkdir etc) you
> > > > can end up sleeping here.
> > > >
> > > > Is that intentional or an oversight? If the former can someone please
> > > > explain the rules and why it's fine in this case?
> > >
> > > I actually saw this semaphore, and there is another xfs lock in
> > > file_accessed
> > > --> touch_atime
> > > --> inode_update_time
> > > --> inode->i_op->update_time == xfs_vn_update_time
> > >
> > > Forgot to point them out in the cover-letter..., I didn't modify them
> > > since I'm not very sure about if we should do so, and I saw Stefan's
> > > patchset didn't modify them too.
> > >
> > > My personnal thinking is we should apply trylock logic for this
> > > inode->i_rwsem. For xfs lock in touch_atime, we should do that since it
> > > doesn't make sense to rollback all the stuff while we are almost at the
> > > end of getdents because of a lock.
> >
> > That manoeuvres around the problem. Which I'm slightly more sensitive
> > too as this review is a rather expensive one.
> >
> > Plus, it seems fixable in at least two ways:
> >
> > For both we need to be able to tell the filesystem that a nowait atime
> > update is requested. Simple thing seems to me to add a S_NOWAIT flag to
> > file_time_flags and passing that via i_op->update_time() which already
> > has a flag argument. That would likely also help kiocb_modified().
> >
> > file_accessed()
> > -> touch_atime()
> > -> inode_update_time()
> > -> i_op->update_time == xfs_vn_update_time()
> >
> > Then we have two options afaict:
> >
> > (1) best-effort atime update
> >
> > file_accessed() already has the builtin assumption that updating atime
> > might fail for other reasons - see the comment in there. So it is
> > somewhat best-effort already.
> >
> > (2) move atime update before calling into filesystem
> >
> > If we want to be sure that access time is updated when a readdir request
> > is issued through io_uring then we need to have file_accessed() give a
> > return value and expose a new helper for io_uring or modify
> > vfs_getdents() to do something like:
> >
> > vfs_getdents()
> > {
> > if (nowait)
> > down_read_trylock()
> >
> > if (!IS_DEADDIR(inode)) {
> > ret = file_accessed(file);
> > if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> > f_op->iterate_shared()
> > }
> > }
> >
> > It's not unprecedented to do update atime before the actual operation
> > has been done afaict. That's already the case in xfs_file_write_checks()
> > which is called before anything is written. So that seems ok.
>
> I'm not familiar with this part(the time update), I guess we should
> revert the updated time if we succeed to do file_accessed(file) but
> fail somewhere later in f_op->iterate_shared()? Or is it definitely
> counted as an "access" as long as we start to call getdents to a file?
To answer that you can simply take a look at readdir rn
res = -ENOENT;
if (!IS_DEADDIR(inode)) {
ctx->pos = file->f_pos;
if (shared)
res = file->f_op->iterate_shared(file, ctx);
else
res = file->f_op->iterate(file, ctx);
file->f_pos = ctx->pos;
fsnotify_access(file);
file_accessed(file);
}
Also, I've said this before: touch_atime() is currently best effort. It
may fail for any kind of reason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 13:21 [PATCH v4 0/5] io_uring getdents Hao Xu
2023-07-18 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: split off vfs_getdents function of getdents64 syscall Hao Xu
2023-07-18 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfs_getdents/struct dir_context: add flags field Hao Xu
2023-07-18 13:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: add support for getdents Hao Xu
2023-07-19 8:56 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-26 15:00 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 11:51 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-27 14:27 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 15:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-07-27 15:52 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 16:17 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-07-27 16:28 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-31 1:58 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-31 7:34 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-31 7:50 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-31 7:40 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-30 18:02 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-31 8:18 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-07-31 9:31 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-31 1:33 ` Dave Chinner
2023-07-31 8:13 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-31 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-07-31 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-01 0:28 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-01 0:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-01 0:49 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-01 1:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-01 7:00 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-01 6:59 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-01 7:17 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-08 4:34 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-08 5:18 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-08 9:33 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-08 22:55 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-01 18:39 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-18 13:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: add NOWAIT semantics for readdir Hao Xu
2023-07-19 2:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-18 13:21 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] disable fixed file for io_uring getdents for now Hao Xu
2023-07-26 14:23 ` Christian Brauner
2023-07-27 12:09 ` Hao Xu
2023-07-19 6:04 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] io_uring getdents Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230731-jawohl-schafsfell-0a890454b2af@brauner \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox