public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCHSET 0/3] io-wq locking improvements
Date: Wed,  9 Aug 2023 13:43:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)

Hi,

In chatting with someone that was trying to use io_uring to read
mailddirs, they found that running a test case that does:

open file, statx file, read file, close file

The culprit here is statx, and argumentation aside on whether it makes
sense to statx in the first place, it does highlight that io-wq is
pretty locking intensive.

This (very lightly tested [1]) patchset attempts to improve this
situation, but reducing the frequency of grabbing wq->lock and
acct->lock.

The first patch gets rid of wq->lock on work insertion. io-wq grabs it
to iterate the free worker list, but that is not necessary.

Second patch reduces the frequency of acct->lock grabs, when we need to
run the queue and process new work. We currently grab the lock and check
for work, then drop it, then grab it again to process the work. That is
unneccessary.

Final patch just optimizes how we activate new workers. It's not related
to the locking itself, just reducing the overhead of activating a new
worker.

Running the above test case on a directory with 50K files, each being
between 10 and 4096 bytes, before these patches we get spend 160-170ms
running the workload. With this patchset, we spend 90-100ms doing the
same work. A bit of profile information is included in the patch commit
messages.

Can also be found here:

https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux/log/?h=io_uring-wq-lock

[1] Runs the test suite just fine, with PROVE_LOCKING enabled and raw
    lockdep as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe



             reply	other threads:[~2023-08-09 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-09 19:43 Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-08-09 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring/io-wq: don't grab wq->lock for worker activation Jens Axboe
2023-08-09 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring/io-wq: reduce frequency of acct->lock acquisitions Jens Axboe
2023-08-09 19:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/io-wq: don't gate worker wake up success on wake_up_process() Jens Axboe
2023-08-11  4:00 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] io-wq locking improvements Hao Xu
2023-08-11 16:36   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox