public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>,
	Mykola Lysenko <[email protected]>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>,
	Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>,
	Song Liu <[email protected]>,
	Yonghong Song <[email protected]>,
	John Fastabend <[email protected]>,
	KP Singh <[email protected]>, Hao Luo <[email protected]>,
	Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>, Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	"Daniel Müller" <[email protected]>,
	"Wang Yufen" <[email protected]>,
	[email protected] (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST
	FRAMEWORK)
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/10] selftests/bpf/sockopt: Add io_uring support
Date: Mon,  4 Sep 2023 09:25:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Expand the sockopt test to use also check for io_uring {g,s}etsockopt
commands operations.

This patch starts by marking each test if they support io_uring support
or not.

Right now, io_uring cmd getsockopt() has a limitation of only
accepting level == SOL_SOCKET, otherwise it returns -EOPNOTSUPP. Since
there aren't any test exercising getsockopt(level == SOL_SOCKET), this
patch changes two tests to use level == SOL_SOCKET, they are
"getsockopt: support smaller ctx->optlen" and "getsockopt: read
ctx->optlen".
There is no limitation for the setsockopt() part.

Later, each test runs using regular {g,s}etsockopt systemcalls, and, if
liburing is supported, execute the same test (again), but calling
liburing {g,s}setsockopt commands.

This patch also changes the level of two tests to use SOL_SOCKET for the
following two tests. This is going to help to exercise the io_uring
subsystem:
 * getsockopt: read ctx->optlen
 * getsockopt: support smaller ctx->optlen

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c        | 113 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
index 9e6a5e3ed4de..9b1f7f0b1f7e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include <io_uring/mini_liburing.h>
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 
 static char bpf_log_buf[4096];
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 	socklen_t			get_optlen_ret;
 
 	enum sockopt_test_error		error;
+	bool				io_uring_support;
 } tests[] = {
 
 	/* ==================== getsockopt ====================  */
@@ -251,7 +253,9 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
 		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
 
+		.get_level = SOL_SOCKET,
 		.get_optlen = 64,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "getsockopt: deny bigger ctx->optlen",
@@ -276,6 +280,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.get_optlen = 64,
 
 		.error = EFAULT_GETSOCKOPT,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "getsockopt: ignore >PAGE_SIZE optlen",
@@ -318,6 +323,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.get_optval = {}, /* the changes are ignored */
 		.get_optlen = PAGE_SIZE + 1,
 		.error = EOPNOTSUPP_GETSOCKOPT,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "getsockopt: support smaller ctx->optlen",
@@ -337,8 +343,10 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
 		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
 
+		.get_level = SOL_SOCKET,
 		.get_optlen = 64,
 		.get_optlen_ret = 32,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "getsockopt: deny writing to ctx->optval",
@@ -518,6 +526,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.set_level = 123,
 
 		.set_optlen = 1,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: allow changing ctx->level",
@@ -572,6 +581,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.set_optname = 123,
 
 		.set_optlen = 1,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: allow changing ctx->optname",
@@ -624,6 +634,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT,
 
 		.set_optlen = 64,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: ctx->optlen == -1 is ok",
@@ -640,6 +651,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT,
 
 		.set_optlen = 64,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: deny ctx->optlen < 0 (except -1)",
@@ -658,6 +670,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.set_optlen = 4,
 
 		.error = EFAULT_SETSOCKOPT,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: deny ctx->optlen > input optlen",
@@ -675,6 +688,7 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.set_optlen = 64,
 
 		.error = EFAULT_SETSOCKOPT,
+		.io_uring_support = true,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: ignore >PAGE_SIZE optlen",
@@ -940,7 +954,89 @@ static int load_prog(const struct bpf_insn *insns,
 	return fd;
 }
 
-static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
+/* Core function that handles io_uring ring initialization,
+ * sending SQE with sockopt command and waiting for the CQE.
+ */
+static int uring_sockopt(int op, int fd, int level, int optname,
+			 const void *optval, socklen_t optlen)
+{
+	struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;
+	struct io_uring_sqe *sqe;
+	struct io_uring ring;
+	int err;
+
+	err = io_uring_queue_init(1, &ring, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "Failed to initialize io_uring ring"))
+		return err;
+
+	sqe = io_uring_get_sqe(&ring);
+	if (!ASSERT_NEQ(sqe, NULL, "Failed to get an SQE")) {
+		err = -1;
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	io_uring_prep_cmd(sqe, op, fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+
+	err = io_uring_submit(&ring);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 1, "Failed to submit SQE"))
+		goto fail;
+
+	err = io_uring_wait_cqe(&ring, &cqe);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "Failed to wait for CQE"))
+		goto fail;
+
+	err = cqe->res;
+
+fail:
+	io_uring_queue_exit(&ring);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int uring_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, const void *optval,
+			    socklen_t optlen)
+{
+	return uring_sockopt(SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT, fd, level, optname,
+			     optval, optlen);
+}
+
+static int uring_getsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, void *optval,
+			    socklen_t *optlen)
+{
+	int ret = uring_sockopt(SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT, fd, level, optname,
+				optval, *optlen);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Populate optlen back to be compatible with systemcall interface,
+	 * and simplify the test.
+	 */
+	*optlen = ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Execute the setsocktopt operation */
+static int call_setsockopt(bool use_io_uring, int fd, int level, int optname,
+			   const void *optval, socklen_t optlen)
+{
+	if (use_io_uring)
+		return uring_setsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+
+	return setsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
+/* Execute the getsocktopt operation */
+static int call_getsockopt(bool use_io_uring, int fd, int level, int optname,
+			   void *optval, socklen_t *optlen)
+{
+	if (use_io_uring)
+		return uring_getsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+
+	return getsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+}
+
+static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test, bool use_io_uring)
 {
 	int sock_fd, err, prog_fd;
 	void *optval = NULL;
@@ -980,8 +1076,9 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
 			test->set_optlen = num_pages * sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) + remainder;
 		}
 
-		err = setsockopt(sock_fd, test->set_level, test->set_optname,
-				 test->set_optval, test->set_optlen);
+		err = call_setsockopt(use_io_uring, sock_fd, test->set_level,
+				      test->set_optname, test->set_optval,
+				      test->set_optlen);
 		if (err) {
 			if (errno == EPERM && test->error == EPERM_SETSOCKOPT)
 				goto close_sock_fd;
@@ -1008,8 +1105,8 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
 		socklen_t expected_get_optlen = test->get_optlen_ret ?:
 			test->get_optlen;
 
-		err = getsockopt(sock_fd, test->get_level, test->get_optname,
-				 optval, &optlen);
+		err = call_getsockopt(use_io_uring, sock_fd, test->get_level,
+				      test->get_optname, optval, &optlen);
 		if (err) {
 			if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP && test->error == EOPNOTSUPP_GETSOCKOPT)
 				goto free_optval;
@@ -1063,7 +1160,11 @@ void test_sockopt(void)
 		if (!test__start_subtest(tests[i].descr))
 			continue;
 
-		ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i]), tests[i].descr);
+		ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], false),
+			  tests[i].descr);
+		if (tests[i].io_uring_support)
+			ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], true),
+				  tests[i].descr);
 	}
 
 	close(cgroup_fd);
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-04 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-04 16:24 [PATCH v4 00/10] io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] bpf: Leverage sockptr_t in BPF getsockopt hook Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] bpf: Leverage sockptr_t in BPF setsockopt hook Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] net/socket: Break down __sys_setsockopt Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] net/socket: Break down __sys_getsockopt Breno Leitao
2023-09-05  9:36   ` David Laight
2023-09-05 10:29   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] io_uring/cmd: Pass compat mode in issue_flags Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] selftests/net: Extract uring helpers to be reusable Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] io_uring/cmd: return -EOPNOTSUPP if net is disabled Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 12:32   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-09-08 17:04     ` Breno Leitao
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 12:24   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT Breno Leitao
2023-09-05 12:24   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-09-04 16:25 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2023-09-05 22:49 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands Jakub Kicinski
2023-09-08 16:55   ` Breno Leitao
2023-10-06 15:45   ` Breno Leitao
2023-10-09 10:11     ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-10-09 13:28       ` Breno Leitao
2023-10-09 16:55         ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox