From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 7/7] ublk: simplify aborting request
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:33:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Now ublk_abort_queue() is run exclusively with ublk_queue_rq() and the
ubq_daemon task, so simplify aborting request:
- set UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED in ublk_abort_queue() just for aborting
this request
- abort request in ublk_queue_rq() if ubq->canceling is set
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 41 +++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 75ed7b87a844..20237b8f318a 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1083,13 +1083,10 @@ static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE);
- if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED)) {
- io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED;
- if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery_reissue(ubq))
- blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
- else
- ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
- }
+ if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery_reissue(ubq))
+ blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
+ else
+ ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
}
static void ubq_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, int res,
@@ -1230,27 +1227,10 @@ static void ublk_rq_task_work_cb(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned issue_flags)
static void ublk_queue_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *rq)
{
struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
- struct ublk_io *io;
- if (!llist_add(&data->node, &ubq->io_cmds))
- return;
+ if (llist_add(&data->node, &ubq->io_cmds)) {
+ struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[rq->tag];
- io = &ubq->ios[rq->tag];
- /*
- * If the check pass, we know that this is a re-issued request aborted
- * previously in cancel fn because the ubq_daemon(cmd's task) is
- * PF_EXITING. We cannot call io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task() anymore
- * because this ioucmd's io_uring context may be freed now if no inflight
- * ioucmd exists. Otherwise we may cause null-deref in ctx->fallback_work.
- *
- * Note: cancel fn sets UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED and ends this request(releasing
- * the tag). Then the request is re-started(allocating the tag) and we are here.
- * Since releasing/allocating a tag implies smp_mb(), finding UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED
- * guarantees that here is a re-issued request aborted previously.
- */
- if (unlikely(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED)) {
- ublk_abort_io_cmds(ubq);
- } else {
io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task(io->cmd, ublk_rq_task_work_cb);
}
}
@@ -1320,13 +1300,12 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
if (ublk_queue_can_use_recovery(ubq) && unlikely(ubq->force_abort))
return BLK_STS_IOERR;
- blk_mq_start_request(bd->rq);
-
if (unlikely(ubq->canceling)) {
__ublk_abort_rq(ubq, rq);
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
+ blk_mq_start_request(bd->rq);
ublk_queue_cmd(ubq, rq);
return BLK_STS_OK;
@@ -1449,8 +1428,10 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
* will do it
*/
rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ubq->q_id], i);
- if (rq)
+ if (rq && blk_mq_request_started(rq)) {
+ io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED;
__ublk_fail_req(ubq, io, rq);
+ }
}
}
}
@@ -1534,7 +1515,7 @@ static void ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
io = &ubq->ios[pdu->tag];
WARN_ON_ONCE(io->cmd != cmd);
- ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, &ubq->ios[pdu->tag], issue_flags);
+ ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, io, issue_flags);
if (need_schedule) {
if (ublk_can_use_recovery(ub))
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 9:33 [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 0/7] ublk: simplify abort with cancelable uring_cmd Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 1/7] ublk: don't get ublk device reference in ublk_abort_queue() Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 2/7] ublk: make sure io cmd handled in submitter task context Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 3/7] ublk: move ublk_cancel_dev() out of ub->mutex Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 4/7] ublk: rename mm_lock as lock Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 5/7] ublk: quiesce request queue when aborting queue Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 6/7] ublk: replace monitor with cancelable uring_cmd Ming Lei
2023-10-09 9:33 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-10-16 23:47 ` [PATCH for-6.7/io_uring 0/7] ublk: simplify abort " Ming Lei
2023-10-17 1:14 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-17 1:13 ` Jens Axboe
2023-10-17 5:00 ` Ming Lei
2023-10-17 14:24 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox