From: Xiaobing Li <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v5] io_uring: Statistics of the true utilization of sq threads.
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:35:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 12/18/23 15:53, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think I'm convinced that the effectiveness of the chosen SQPOLL
> settings being exposed is useful, I'm just not sure fdinfo is the right
> place to do it. Is it going to be a problem that these are just
> perpetual stats, with no way to reset them? This means there's no way to
> monitor it for a period of time and get effectiveness for something
> specific, it'll always just count from when the ring was created.
>
> We could of course have the act of reading the stat also reset it, but
> maybe that'd be a bit odd?
>
> Alternatively, it could be exported differently, eg as a register opcode
> perhaps.
>
> Open to suggestions...
I thought carefully about your proposed reset stat, and I think it can be
achieved by outputting "work_time" and "total_time".
eg:
Output at time t1:
SqMask: 0x3
SqHead: 1168417
SqTail: 1168418
SqWorkTime: t1_work
SqTotalTime: t1_total
Output at time t2:
SqMask: 0x3
SqHead: 1168417
SqTail: 1168418
SqWorkTime: t2_work
SqTotalTime: t2_total
Then we can manually calculate the utilization rate from t1 to t2:
(t2_work - t1_work) / (t2_total - t1_total)
Not sure what you think, but if you think it doesn't work, I'll look into
other good ways to add the ability to reset.
In addition, on register opcode - generally it is used for resource like
buffers, handles etc.. I am not sure how that can help here. If you have
something in mind, could you please elaborate in more detail?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-22 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20231218085950epcas5p4171efba84d8c14bf1307aa16c48414ca@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2023-12-18 8:51 ` [PATCH v5] io_uring: Statistics of the true utilization of sq threads Xiaobing Li
2023-12-18 15:53 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CGME20231222084334epcas5p10badfe3c82a6b8355c03f8d0aa192892@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2023-12-22 8:35 ` Xiaobing Li [this message]
2023-12-22 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <CGME20231225024445epcas5p1d0525b9595544d8fe7b8ea60f5741b58@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2023-12-25 2:36 ` Xiaobing Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox