public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] io_uring: remove unconditional looping in local task_work handling
Date: Tue,  6 Feb 2024 09:24:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

If we have a ton of notifications coming in, we can be looping in here
for a long time. This can be problematic for various reasons, mostly
because we can starve userspace. If the application is waiting on N
events, then only re-run if we need more events.

Fixes: c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index a587b240fa48..ddbce269b6a7 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1386,7 +1386,20 @@ static void __cold io_move_task_work_from_local(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	}
 }
 
-static int __io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_tw_state *ts)
+static bool io_run_local_work_continue(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int events,
+				       int min_events)
+{
+	if (llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
+		return false;
+	if (events < min_events)
+		return true;
+	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_TASKRUN_FLAG)
+		atomic_or(IORING_SQ_TASKRUN, &ctx->rings->sq_flags);
+	return false;
+}
+
+static int __io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_tw_state *ts,
+			       int min_events)
 {
 	struct llist_node *node;
 	unsigned int loops = 0;
@@ -1414,18 +1427,20 @@ static int __io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_tw_state *ts)
 	}
 	loops++;
 
-	if (!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
+	if (io_run_local_work_continue(ctx, ret, min_events))
 		goto again;
 	if (ts->locked) {
 		io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
-		if (!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
+		if (io_run_local_work_continue(ctx, ret, min_events))
 			goto again;
 	}
+
 	trace_io_uring_local_work_run(ctx, ret, loops);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static inline int io_run_local_work_locked(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+static inline int io_run_local_work_locked(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+					   int min_events)
 {
 	struct io_tw_state ts = { .locked = true, };
 	int ret;
@@ -1433,20 +1448,20 @@ static inline int io_run_local_work_locked(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	if (llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = __io_run_local_work(ctx, &ts);
+	ret = __io_run_local_work(ctx, &ts, min_events);
 	/* shouldn't happen! */
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ts.locked))
 		mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+static int io_run_local_work(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events)
 {
 	struct io_tw_state ts = {};
 	int ret;
 
 	ts.locked = mutex_trylock(&ctx->uring_lock);
-	ret = __io_run_local_work(ctx, &ts);
+	ret = __io_run_local_work(ctx, &ts, min_events);
 	if (ts.locked)
 		mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 
@@ -1642,7 +1657,7 @@ static int io_iopoll_check(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, long min)
 		    io_task_work_pending(ctx)) {
 			u32 tail = ctx->cached_cq_tail;
 
-			(void) io_run_local_work_locked(ctx);
+			(void) io_run_local_work_locked(ctx, min);
 
 			if (task_work_pending(current) ||
 			    wq_list_empty(&ctx->iopoll_list)) {
@@ -2486,7 +2501,7 @@ int io_run_task_work_sig(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	if (!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist)) {
 		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-		if (io_run_local_work(ctx) > 0)
+		if (io_run_local_work(ctx, INT_MAX) > 0)
 			return 0;
 	}
 	if (io_run_task_work() > 0)
@@ -2554,7 +2569,7 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
 	if (!io_allowed_run_tw(ctx))
 		return -EEXIST;
 	if (!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
-		io_run_local_work(ctx);
+		io_run_local_work(ctx, min_events);
 	io_run_task_work();
 	io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx);
 	/* if user messes with these they will just get an early return */
@@ -2592,11 +2607,10 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
 
 	trace_io_uring_cqring_wait(ctx, min_events);
 	do {
+		int nr_wait = (int) iowq.cq_tail - READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.tail);
 		unsigned long check_cq;
 
 		if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN) {
-			int nr_wait = (int) iowq.cq_tail - READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.tail);
-
 			atomic_set(&ctx->cq_wait_nr, nr_wait);
 			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		} else {
@@ -2615,7 +2629,7 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
 		 */
 		io_run_task_work();
 		if (!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist))
-			io_run_local_work(ctx);
+			io_run_local_work(ctx, nr_wait);
 
 		/*
 		 * Non-local task_work will be run on exit to userspace, but
@@ -3270,7 +3284,7 @@ static __cold bool io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 
 	if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN) &&
 	    io_allowed_defer_tw_run(ctx))
-		ret |= io_run_local_work(ctx) > 0;
+		ret |= io_run_local_work(ctx, INT_MAX) > 0;
 	ret |= io_cancel_defer_files(ctx, task, cancel_all);
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	ret |= io_poll_remove_all(ctx, task, cancel_all);
@@ -3632,7 +3646,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(io_uring_enter, unsigned int, fd, u32, to_submit,
 			 * it should handle ownership problems if any.
 			 */
 			if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN)
-				(void)io_run_local_work_locked(ctx);
+				(void)io_run_local_work_locked(ctx, min_complete);
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06 16:24 [PATCHSET next 0/10] Various network improvements Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] io_uring/kbuf: cleanup passing back cflags Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] io_uring: remove looping around handling traditional task_work Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] io_uring: remove 'loops' argument from trace_io_uring_task_work_run() Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] io_uring: handle traditional task_work in FIFO order Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] io_uring: remove next io_kiocb fetch in task_work running Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] io_uring/poll: improve readability of poll reference decrementing Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] io_uring: cleanup handle_tw_list() calling convention Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] io_uring: pass in counter to handle_tw_list() rather than return it Jens Axboe
2024-02-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work privately Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox