public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
To: Jeff Johnson <[email protected]>
Cc: LKML <[email protected]>,
	Linux Trace Kernel <[email protected]>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>,
	Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	<[email protected]>,
	Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FYI][PATCH] tracing/treewide: Remove second parameter of __assign_str()
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:46:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:30:45 -0800
Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2/23/2024 9:56 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <[email protected]>
> > 
> > [
> >    This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
> >    the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it then. Hoping
> >    to keep the conflicts that it will cause to a minimum.
> > ]
> > 
> > With the rework of how the __string() handles dynamic strings where it
> > saves off the source string in field in the helper structure[1], the
> > assignment of that value to the trace event field is stored in the helper
> > value and does not need to be passed in again.  
> 
> Just curious if this could be done piecemeal by first changing the
> macros to be variadic macros which allows you to ignore the extra
> argument. The callers could then be modified in their separate trees.
> And then once all the callers have be merged, the macros could be
> changed to no longer be variadic.

I weighed doing that, but I think ripping off the band-aid is a better
approach. One thing I found is that leaving unused parameters in the macros
can cause bugs itself. I found one case doing my clean up, where an unused
parameter in one of the macros was bogus, and when I made it a used
parameter, it broke the build.

I think for tree-wide changes, the preferred approach is to do one big
patch at once. And since this only affects TRACE_EVENT() macros, it
hopefully would not be too much of a burden (although out of tree users may
suffer from this, but do we care?)

Now one thing I could do is to not remove the parameter, but just add:

	WARN_ON_ONCE((src) != __data_offsets->item##_ptr_);

in the __assign_str() macro to make sure that it's still the same that is
assigned. But I'm not sure how useful that is, and still causes burden to
have it. I never really liked the passing of the string in two places to
begin with.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-23 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23 17:56 [FYI][PATCH] tracing/treewide: Remove second parameter of __assign_str() Steven Rostedt
2024-02-23 18:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-02-23 18:30 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-02-23 18:46   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-02-23 19:50     ` Kent Overstreet
2024-02-23 20:03       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-02-23 20:45     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-14 16:57 ` Alison Schofield
2024-03-14 18:34   ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox