From: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH] net: Do not break out of sk_stream_wait_memory() with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:01:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
It can happen that a socket sends the remaining data at close() time.
With io_uring and KTLS it can happen that sk_stream_wait_memory() bails
out with -512 (-ERESTARTSYS) because TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is set for the
current task. This flag has been set in io_req_normal_work_add() by
calling task_work_add().
This patch replaces signal_pending() with task_sigpending(), thus ignoring
the TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL flag.
A discussion of this issue can be found at
https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Suggested-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
---
net/core/stream.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/stream.c b/net/core/stream.c
index 96fbcb9bbb30a..e9e17b48e0122 100644
--- a/net/core/stream.c
+++ b/net/core/stream.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int sk_stream_wait_connect(struct sock *sk, long *timeo_p)
return -EPIPE;
if (!*timeo_p)
return -EAGAIN;
- if (signal_pending(tsk))
+ if (task_sigpending(tsk))
return sock_intr_errno(*timeo_p);
add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void sk_stream_wait_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
do {
if (sk_wait_event(sk, &timeout, !sk_stream_closing(sk), &wait))
break;
- } while (!signal_pending(current) && timeout);
+ } while (!task_sigpending(current) && timeout);
remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
}
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ int sk_stream_wait_memory(struct sock *sk, long *timeo_p)
goto do_error;
if (!*timeo_p)
goto do_eagain;
- if (signal_pending(current))
+ if (task_sigpending(current))
goto do_interrupted;
sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, sk);
if (sk_stream_memory_free(sk) && !vm_wait)
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-15 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-15 10:01 Sascha Hauer [this message]
2024-03-15 16:43 ` [PATCH] net: Do not break out of sk_stream_wait_memory() with TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL Jens Axboe
2024-03-15 17:02 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 12:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-18 13:19 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-19 10:50 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-19 13:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-19 15:08 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-18 12:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2024-03-19 12:30 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox