From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 233C427447; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712311568; cv=none; b=D2+GNGhWbaDKarp12olKjo/Da2oCBrsx+jPtQI1NCYcrm0HYTLVgs3KlxirxDXza+Wb+3nOpikSywUIO7oeULNVExVJD/Zu75at7rMlPj2zf40lPfWk6FCEG610tisUemDGNPj0j1TXTd6cNOkXvrQ2+h0OxbbjxySHHy9y7LnM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712311568; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Me5fgptfJ8ZJo8giw44Uy7MjFU/XOEw3k5qpoY6sMrQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=n2+uy7d7grQGc2aTaDiBIWyDCBKqoPVSApl7OFASZSuU7clDPLIZOHgVCNm3B/o4fATFVxyzFbg3XzTZ1GqdGTcNKMvjNrpLvx5NWDM0+6Zb080R2bw+OygObQpRgjOlBrBxkPPailk08JZqc1JZTN91RxAk8o/k+vMObvu7mv0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R4E070CU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R4E070CU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC13DC433C7; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:06:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712311567; bh=Me5fgptfJ8ZJo8giw44Uy7MjFU/XOEw3k5qpoY6sMrQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R4E070CUK5KUGSiaYz9yG8ZzWlVdkWaPDKUdV3QI6Ct9FBruRQu8ky48bav6soBa0 uBuiJlSWbUqBGxMzYhvgIih5xYxN4t+RMBrclZG2bHWHpeB0E63hnQ1snIjD4Hn+zH m/C5VFfiWR8RbFSb2Zquf17qDaRClkm2AGpRtgYTzt1+MHn0bgHyPFX/IOcLNnQ78C SsjYloYPJ2eXGHtqpiWTGDnWzEuqNeSQrHr2gJD4UrTp8SuVU2M8sI6ev68TXyuaMZ GL83hvy0eVrkxEo37p6gkji2n/HWLvGiFxdmVA3sUuNIqSbErWguGX0ifn6Wr4rzH0 vPhn8kQdELRNQ== Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:06:00 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Dave Chinner , io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: claw back a few FMODE_* bits Message-ID: <20240405-maulkorb-berglandschaft-91fcbd452394@brauner> References: <20240328-gewendet-spargel-aa60a030ef74@brauner> <20240404001823.GP538574@ZenIV> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240404001823.GP538574@ZenIV> > in the same underlying filesystem the usual way - you wouldn't be able > to store that in file_operations, simply because the instances with > identical ->f_op might differ in that flag. Yeah, good point. I never tried to actually do it otherwise it would've been quite obvious. Thanks!