From: Bernd Schubert <[email protected]>
To: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>,
Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Bernd Schubert <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>,
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>,
Andrei Vagin <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 20:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
From: Bernd Schubert <[email protected]>
This adds support for uring communication between kernel and
userspace daemon using opcode the IORING_OP_URING_CMD. The basic
appraoch was taken from ublk. The patches are in RFC state,
some major changes are still to be expected.
Motivation for these patches is all to increase fuse performance.
In fuse-over-io-uring requests avoid core switching (application
on core X, processing of fuse server on random core Y) and use
shared memory between kernel and userspace to transfer data.
Similar approaches have been taken by ZUFS and FUSE2, though
not over io-uring, but through ioctl IOs
https://lwn.net/Articles/756625/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git/log/?h=fuse2
Avoiding cache line bouncing / numa systems was discussed
between Amir and Miklos before and Miklos had posted
part of the private discussion here
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAJfpegtL3NXPNgK1kuJR8kLu3WkVC_ErBPRfToLEiA_0=w3=hA@mail.gmail.com/
This cache line bouncing should be addressed by these patches
as well.
I had also noticed waitq wake-up latencies in fuse before
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
This spinning approach helped with performance (>40% improvement
for file creates), but due to random server side thread/core utilization
spinning cannot be well controlled in /dev/fuse mode.
With fuse-over-io-uring requests are handled on the same core
(sync requests) or on core+1 (large async requests) and performance
improvements are achieved without spinning.
Splice/zero-copy is not supported yet, Ming Lei is working
on io-uring support for ublk_drv, but I think so far there
is no final agreement on the approach to be taken yet.
Fuse-over-io-uring runs significantly faster than reads/writes
over /dev/fuse, even with splice enabled, so missing zc
should not be a blocking issue.
The patches have been tested with multiple xfstest runs in a VM
(32 cores) with a kernel that has several debug options
enabled (like KASAN and MSAN).
For some tests xfstests reports that O_DIRECT is not supported,
I need to investigate that. Interesting part is that exactly
these tests fail in plain /dev/fuse posix mode. I had to disabled
generic/650, which is enabling/disabling cpu cores - given ring
threads are bound to cores issues with that are no totally
unexpected, but then there (scheduler) kernel messages that
core binding for these threads is removed - this needs
to be further investigates.
Nice effect in io-uring mode is that tests run faster (like
generic/522 ~2400s /dev/fuse vs. ~1600s patched), though still
slow as this is with ASAN/leak-detection/etc.
The corresponding libfuse patches are on my uring branch,
but need cleanup for submission - will happen during the next
days.
https://github.com/bsbernd/libfuse/tree/uring
If it should make review easier, patches posted here are on
this branch
https://github.com/bsbernd/linux/tree/fuse-uring-for-6.9-rfc2
TODO list for next RFC versions
- Let the ring configure ioctl return information, like mmap/queue-buf size
- Request kernel side address and len for a request - avoid calculation in userspace?
- multiple IO sizes per queue (avoiding a calculation in userspace is probably even
more important)
- FUSE_INTERRUPT handling?
- Logging (adds fields in the ioctl and also ring-request),
any mismatch between client and server is currently very hard to understand
through error codes
Future work
- notifications, probably on their own ring
- zero copy
I had run quite some benchmarks with linux-6.2 before LSFMMBPF2023,
which, resulted in some tuning patches (at the end of the
patch series).
Some benchmark results
======================
System used for the benchmark is a 32 core (HyperThreading enabled)
Xeon E5-2650 system. I don't have local disks attached that could do
>5GB/s IOs, for paged and dio results a patched version of passthrough-hp
was used that bypasses final reads/writes.
paged reads
-----------
128K IO size 1024K IO size
jobs /dev/fuse uring gain /dev/fuse uring gain
1 1117 1921 1.72 1902 1942 1.02
2 2502 3527 1.41 3066 3260 1.06
4 5052 6125 1.21 5994 6097 1.02
8 6273 10855 1.73 7101 10491 1.48
16 6373 11320 1.78 7660 11419 1.49
24 6111 9015 1.48 7600 9029 1.19
32 5725 7968 1.39 6986 7961 1.14
dio reads (1024K)
-----------------
jobs /dev/fuse uring gain
1 2023 3998 2.42
2 3375 7950 2.83
4 3823 15022 3.58
8 7796 22591 2.77
16 8520 27864 3.27
24 8361 20617 2.55
32 8717 12971 1.55
mmap reads (4K)
---------------
(sequential, I probably should have made it random, sequential exposes
a rather interesting/weird 'optimized' memcpy issue - sequential becomes
reversed order 4K read)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected]/
jobs /dev/fuse uring gain
1 130 323 2.49
2 219 538 2.46
4 503 1040 2.07
8 1472 2039 1.38
16 2191 3518 1.61
24 2453 4561 1.86
32 2178 5628 2.58
(Results on request, setting MAP_HUGETLB much improves performance
for both, io-uring mode then has a slight advantage only.)
creates/s
----------
threads /dev/fuse uring gain
1 3944 10121 2.57
2 8580 24524 2.86
4 16628 44426 2.67
8 46746 56716 1.21
16 79740 102966 1.29
20 80284 119502 1.49
(the gain drop with >=8 cores needs to be investigated)
Remaining TODO list for RFCv3:
--------------------------------
1) Let the ring configure ioctl return information,
like mmap/queue-buf size
Right now libfuse and kernel have lots of duplicated setup code
and any kind of pointer/offset mismatch results in a non-working
ring that is hard to debug - probably better when the kernel does
the calculations and returns that to server side
2) In combination with 1, ring requests should retrieve their
userspace address and length from kernel side instead of
calculating it through the mmaped queue buffer on their own.
(Introduction of FUSE_URING_BUF_ADDR_FETCH)
3) Add log buffer into the ioctl and ring-request
This is to provide better error messages (instead of just
errno)
3) Multiple IO sizes per queue
Small IOs and metadata requests do not need large buffer sizes,
we need multiple IO sizes per queue.
4) FUSE_INTERRUPT handling
These are not handled yet, kernel side is probably not difficult
anymore as ring entries take fuse requests through lists.
Long term TODO:
--------------
Notifications through io-uring, maybe with a separated ring,
but I'm not sure yet.
Changes since RFCv1
-------------------
- No need to hold the task of the server side anymore. Also no
ioctls/threads waiting for shutdown anymore. Shutdown now more
works like the traditional fuse way.
- Each queue clones the fuse and device release makes an exception
for io-uring. Reason is that queued IORING_OP_URING_CMD
(through .uring_cmd) prevent a device release. I.e. a killed
server side typically triggers fuse_abort_conn(). This was the
reason for the async stop-monitor in v1 and reference on the daemon
task. However it was very racy and annotated immediately by Miklos.
- In v1 the offset parameter to mmap was identifying the QID, in v2
server side is expected to send mmap from a core bound ring thread
in numa mode and numa node is taken through the core of that thread.
Kernel side of the mmap buffer is stored in an rbtree and assigned
to the right qid through an additional queue ioctl.
- Release of IORING_OP_URING_CMD is done through lists now, instead
of iterating over the entire array of queues/entries and does not
depend on the entry state anymore (a bit of the state is still left
for sanity check).
- Finding free ring queue entries is done through lists and not through
a bitmap anymore
- Many other code changes and bug fixes
- Performance tunings
---
Bernd Schubert (19):
fuse: rename to fuse_dev_end_requests and make non-static
fuse: Move fuse_get_dev to header file
fuse: Move request bits
fuse: Add fuse-io-uring design documentation
fuse: Add a uring config ioctl
Add a vmalloc_node_user function
fuse uring: Add an mmap method
fuse: Add the queue configuration ioctl
fuse: {uring} Add a dev_release exception for fuse-over-io-uring
fuse: {uring} Handle SQEs - register commands
fuse: Add support to copy from/to the ring buffer
fuse: {uring} Add uring sqe commit and fetch support
fuse: {uring} Handle uring shutdown
fuse: {uring} Allow to queue to the ring
export __wake_on_current_cpu
fuse: {uring} Wake requests on the the current cpu
fuse: {uring} Send async requests to qid of core + 1
fuse: {uring} Set a min cpu offset io-size for reads/writes
fuse: {uring} Optimize async sends
Documentation/filesystems/fuse-io-uring.rst | 167 ++++
fs/fuse/Kconfig | 12 +
fs/fuse/Makefile | 1 +
fs/fuse/dev.c | 310 +++++--
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c | 1232 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h | 395 +++++++++
fs/fuse/file.c | 15 +-
fs/fuse/fuse_dev_i.h | 67 ++
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 9 +
fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 +
include/linux/vmalloc.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 135 +++
kernel/sched/wait.c | 1 +
mm/nommu.c | 6 +
mm/vmalloc.c | 41 +-
15 files changed, 2330 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: dd5a440a31fae6e459c0d6271dddd62825505361
change-id: 20240529-fuse-uring-for-6-9-rfc2-out-f0a009005fdf
Best regards,
--
Bernd Schubert <[email protected]>
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 18:00 Bernd Schubert [this message]
2024-05-29 18:00 ` [PATCH RFC v2 19/19] fuse: {uring} Optimize async sends Bernd Schubert
2024-05-31 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-31 17:36 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-05-31 19:10 ` Jens Axboe
2024-06-01 16:37 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-05-30 7:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring Amir Goldstein
2024-05-30 12:09 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-05-30 15:36 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-30 16:02 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-05-30 16:10 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-30 16:17 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-05-30 17:30 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-30 19:09 ` Josef Bacik
2024-05-30 20:05 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-31 3:53 ` [PATCH] fs: sys_ringbuffer() (WIP) Kent Overstreet
2024-05-31 13:11 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-31 15:49 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-30 16:21 ` [PATCH RFC v2 00/19] fuse: fuse-over-io-uring Jens Axboe
2024-05-30 16:32 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-05-30 17:26 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-30 17:16 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-30 17:28 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-30 17:58 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-30 18:48 ` Jens Axboe
2024-05-30 19:35 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-05-31 0:11 ` Jens Axboe
2024-06-04 23:45 ` Ming Lei
2024-05-30 20:47 ` Josef Bacik
2024-06-11 8:20 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-06-11 10:26 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-11 15:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-06-11 17:37 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-11 23:35 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-12 13:53 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-12 14:19 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-12 15:40 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-12 15:55 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-12 16:15 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-12 16:24 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-06-12 16:44 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-12 7:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-06-12 13:32 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-12 13:46 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-06-12 14:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-06-12 14:56 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-08-02 23:03 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-08-29 22:32 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-08-30 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
2024-08-30 13:28 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-08-30 13:33 ` Jens Axboe
2024-08-30 14:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-08-30 15:10 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-08-30 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2024-08-31 0:02 ` Bernd Schubert
2024-08-31 0:49 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240529-fuse-uring-for-6-9-rfc2-out-v1-0-d149476b1d65@ddn.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox