From: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
To: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Huacai Chen <[email protected]>,
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>,
Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Jan Kara <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:45:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240703-bergwacht-sitzung-ef4f2e63cd70@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 07:06:53PM GMT, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024, at 17:36, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 7:59 PM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024, at 04:39, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 2024-06-30 at 09:40 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, both Linus and Christian hates introducing a new AT_ flag for
> >> >> > this.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This patch just makes statx(fd, NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) behave
> >> >> > like
> >> >> > statx(fd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) instead. NULL avoids the
> >> >> > performance
> >> >> > issue and it's also audit-able by seccomp BPF.
> >> >> To be honest, I still want to restore __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT. Because
> >> >> even if statx() becomes audit-able, it is still blacklisted now.
> >> >
> >> > Then patch the sandbox to allow it.
> >> >
> >> > The sandbox **must** be patched anyway or it'll be broken on all 32-bit
> >> > systems after 2037. [Unless they'll unsupport all 32-bit systems before
> >> > 2037.]
> >>
> >> More importantly, the sandbox won't be able to support any 32-bit
> >> targets that support running after 2037, regardless of how long
> >> the sandbox supports them: if you turn off COMPAT_32BIT_TIME today
> >> in order to be sure those don't get called by accident, the
> >> fallback is immediately broken.
> > Would you mind if I restore newstat for LoongArch64 even if this patch exist?
>
> I still prefer not add newstat back: it's easier to
> get applications to correctly implement the statx() code
> path if there are more architectures that only have that.
I agree.
We've now added AT_EMPTY_PATH support with NULL names because we want to
allow that generically. But I clearly remember that this was requested
to make statx() work with these sandboxes. So the kernel has done its
part. Now it's for the sandbox to allow statx() with NULL paths and
AT_EMPTY_PATH but certainly not for the kernel to start reenabling old
system calls.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 11:00 [PATCH 0/2] statx NULL path support Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: add CLASS fd_raw Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 12:22 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:13 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 13:24 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:28 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:28 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 14:09 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-25 14:58 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-30 1:40 ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-30 2:39 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-30 13:18 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-01 11:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-02 15:36 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-02 17:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-03 4:30 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-03 8:45 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-07-03 9:35 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-03 10:07 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 16:54 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 17:30 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:14 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 18:39 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:48 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 19:33 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-03 19:55 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 17:11 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04 2:38 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-04 3:23 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04 4:14 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04 5:55 ` Florian Weimer
2024-07-04 6:02 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-01 4:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] statx NULL path support Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01 6:46 ` Xi Ruoyao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240703-bergwacht-sitzung-ef4f2e63cd70@brauner \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox