From: Anuj Gupta <[email protected]>
To: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] block: handle split correctly for user meta bounce buffer
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 16:48:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828111806.GA3301@green245> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2864 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 04:08:03PM +0530, Anuj Gupta wrote:
> > Copy back the bounce buffer to user-space in entirety when the parent
> > bio completes.
>
> This looks odd to me. The usual way to handle iterating the entire
> submitter controlled data is to just iterate over the bvec array, as
> done by bio_for_each_segment_all/bio_for_each_bvec_all for the bio
> data. I think you want to do the same here, probably with a
> similar bip_for_each_bvec_all or similar helper. That way you don't
> need to stash away the iter. Currently we have the field for that,
> but I really want to split up struct bio_integrity_payload into
> what is actually needed for the payload and stuff only needed for
> the block layer autogenerated PI (bip_bio/bio_iter/bip_work).
I can add it [*], to iterate over the entire bvec array. But the original
bio_iter still needs to be stored during submission, to calculate the
number of bytes in the original integrity/metadata iter (as it could have
gotten split, and I don't have original integrity iter stored anywhere).
Do you have a different opinion?
[*]
diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
index ff7de4fe74c4..f1690c644e70 100644
--- a/block/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
@@ -125,11 +125,23 @@ static void bio_integrity_uncopy_user(struct bio_integrity_payload *bip)
struct bio_vec *copy = &bip->bip_vec[1];
size_t bytes = bio_iter_integrity_bytes(bi, bip->bio_iter);
struct iov_iter iter;
- int ret;
+ struct bio_vec *bvec;
+ struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_DEST, copy, nr_vecs, bytes);
- ret = copy_to_iter(bvec_virt(bip->bip_vec), bytes, &iter);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != bytes);
+ bip_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bip, iter_all) {
+ ssize_t ret;
+
+ ret = copy_page_to_iter(bvec->bv_page,
+ bvec->bv_offset,
+ bvec->bv_len,
+ &iter);
+
+ if (!iov_iter_count(&iter))
+ break;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < bvec->bv_len);
+ }
bio_integrity_unpin_bvec(copy, nr_vecs, true);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/bio-integrity.h b/include/linux/bio-integrity.h
index 22ff2ae16444..3132ef6f27e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio-integrity.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio-integrity.h
@@ -46,6 +46,19 @@ struct uio_meta {
struct iov_iter iter;
};
+static inline bool bip_next_segment(const struct bio_integrity_payload *bip,
+ struct bvec_iter_all *iter)
+{
+ if (iter->idx >= bip->bip_vcnt)
+ return false;
+
+ bvec_advance(&bip->bip_vec[iter->idx], iter);
+ return true;
+}
+
+#define bip_for_each_segment_all(bvl, bip, iter) \
+ for (bvl = bvec_init_iter_all(&iter); bip_next_segment((bip), &iter); )
+
#define BIP_CLONE_FLAGS (BIP_MAPPED_INTEGRITY | BIP_CTRL_NOCHECK | \
BIP_DISK_NOCHECK | BIP_IP_CHECKSUM | \
BIP_CHECK_GUARD | BIP_CHECK_REFTAG | \
--
2.25.1
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240823104552epcas5p226dbbbd448cd0ee0955ffdd3ad1b112d@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104616epcas5p4bd315bd116ea7e32b1abf7e174af64a1@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 3:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104618epcas5p4b9983678886dceed75edd9cbec9341b2@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] block: introduce a helper to determine metadata bytes from data iter Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 3:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104620epcas5p2118c152963d6cadfbc9968790ac0e536@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] block: handle split correctly for user meta bounce buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 11:18 ` Anuj Gupta [this message]
2024-08-29 4:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104622epcas5p2e3b29f793eff9857c5712b3d6d327ed5@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104624epcas5p40c1b0f3516100f69cbd31d45867cd289@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 3:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104627epcas5p2abcd2283f6fb3301e1a8e828e3c270ae@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send meta along with read/write Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104629epcas5p3fea0cb7e66b0446ddacf7648c08c3ba8@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 13:42 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-08-29 3:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 13:29 ` Anuj gupta
2024-09-12 12:40 ` Anuj Gupta
2024-09-13 2:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104631epcas5p4f83b92081107fbefca78008ee319ff7e@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block,nvme: " Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104634epcas5p4ef1af26cc7146b4e8b7a4a1844ffe476@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104636epcas5p4825a6d2dd9e45cfbcc97895264662d30@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] nvme: add handling for app_tag Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 3:00 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29 10:18 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-13 2:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <CGME20240823104639epcas5p11dbab393122841419368a86b4bd5c04b@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24 8:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240828111806.GA3301@green245 \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox