public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected],
	Uday Shankar <[email protected]>,
	Akilesh Kailash <[email protected]>,
	Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH V9 7/7] ublk: support leasing io buffer to io_uring
Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2024 20:26:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Suopport to lease block IO buffer for userpace to run io_uring operations(FS,
network IO), then ublk zero copy can be supported.

userspace code:

	git clone https://github.com/ublk-org/ublksrv.git -b uring_group

And both loop and nbd zero copy(io_uring send and send zc) are covered.

Performance improvement is quite obvious in big block size test, such as
'loop --buffered_io' perf is doubled in 64KB block test("loop/007 vs
loop/009").

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c      | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h |  11 ++-
 2 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 6ba2c1dd1d87..5803c6418d1e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
 /* private ioctl command mirror */
 #define UBLK_CMD_DEL_DEV_ASYNC	_IOC_NR(UBLK_U_CMD_DEL_DEV_ASYNC)
 
+#define UBLK_IO_PROVIDE_IO_BUF _IOC_NR(UBLK_U_IO_PROVIDE_IO_BUF)
+
 /* All UBLK_F_* have to be included into UBLK_F_ALL */
 #define UBLK_F_ALL (UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY \
 		| UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK \
@@ -71,6 +73,9 @@ struct ublk_rq_data {
 	struct llist_node node;
 
 	struct kref ref;
+
+	bool allocated_bvec;
+	struct io_mapped_buf buf[0];
 };
 
 struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu {
@@ -189,11 +194,15 @@ struct ublk_params_header {
 	__u32	types;
 };
 
+static inline struct request *__ublk_check_and_get_req(struct ublk_device *ub,
+		struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag, size_t offset);
 static bool ublk_abort_requests(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
 
 static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
 static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *ublk_get_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 						   int tag);
+static void ublk_io_buf_giveback_cb(const struct io_mapped_buf *buf);
+
 static inline bool ublk_dev_is_user_copy(const struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
 	return ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_USER_COPY;
@@ -588,6 +597,11 @@ static inline bool ublk_need_req_ref(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
 	return ublk_support_user_copy(ubq);
 }
 
+static inline bool ublk_support_zc(const struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+{
+	return ubq->flags & UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
+}
+
 static inline void ublk_init_req_ref(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 		struct request *req)
 {
@@ -851,6 +865,72 @@ static size_t ublk_copy_user_pages(const struct request *req,
 	return done;
 }
 
+/*
+ * The built command buffer is immutable, so it is fine to feed it to
+ * concurrent io_uring provide buf commands
+ */
+static int ublk_init_zero_copy_buffer(struct request *req)
+{
+	struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+	struct io_mapped_buf *imu = data->buf;
+	struct req_iterator rq_iter;
+	unsigned int nr_bvecs = 0;
+	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	unsigned int offset;
+	struct bio_vec bv;
+
+	if (!ublk_rq_has_data(req))
+		goto exit;
+
+	rq_for_each_bvec(bv, req, rq_iter)
+		nr_bvecs++;
+
+	if (!nr_bvecs)
+		goto exit;
+
+	if (req->bio != req->biotail) {
+		int idx = 0;
+
+		bvec = kvmalloc_array(nr_bvecs, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
+				GFP_NOIO);
+		if (!bvec)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		offset = 0;
+		rq_for_each_bvec(bv, req, rq_iter)
+			bvec[idx++] = bv;
+		data->allocated_bvec = true;
+	} else {
+		struct bio *bio = req->bio;
+
+		offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
+		bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
+	}
+	imu->kbuf = 1;
+	imu->pbvec = bvec;
+	imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
+	imu->offset = offset;
+	imu->len = blk_rq_bytes(req);
+	imu->dir = req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ ? ITER_DEST : ITER_SOURCE;
+	imu->kbuf_ack = ublk_io_buf_giveback_cb;
+
+	return 0;
+exit:
+	imu->pbvec = NULL;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void ublk_deinit_zero_copy_buffer(struct request *req)
+{
+	struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+	struct io_mapped_buf *imu = data->buf;
+
+	if (data->allocated_bvec) {
+		kvfree(imu->pbvec);
+		data->allocated_bvec = false;
+	}
+}
+
 static inline bool ublk_need_map_req(const struct request *req)
 {
 	return ublk_rq_has_data(req) && req_op(req) == REQ_OP_WRITE;
@@ -862,13 +942,25 @@ static inline bool ublk_need_unmap_req(const struct request *req)
 	       (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN);
 }
 
-static int ublk_map_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, const struct request *req,
+static int ublk_map_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req,
 		struct ublk_io *io)
 {
 	const unsigned int rq_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(req);
 
-	if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq))
+	if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq)) {
+		if (ublk_support_zc(ubq)) {
+			int ret = ublk_init_zero_copy_buffer(req);
+
+			/*
+			 * The only failure is -ENOMEM for allocating providing
+			 * buffer command, return zero so that we can requeue
+			 * this req.
+			 */
+			if (unlikely(ret))
+				return 0;
+		}
 		return rq_bytes;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * no zero copy, we delay copy WRITE request data into ublksrv
@@ -886,13 +978,16 @@ static int ublk_map_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq, const struct request *req,
 }
 
 static int ublk_unmap_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
-		const struct request *req,
+		struct request *req,
 		struct ublk_io *io)
 {
 	const unsigned int rq_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(req);
 
-	if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq))
+	if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq)) {
+		if (ublk_support_zc(ubq))
+			ublk_deinit_zero_copy_buffer(req);
 		return rq_bytes;
+	}
 
 	if (ublk_need_unmap_req(req)) {
 		struct iov_iter iter;
@@ -1038,6 +1133,7 @@ static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req)
 
 	return;
 exit:
+	ublk_deinit_zero_copy_buffer(req);
 	blk_mq_end_request(req, res);
 }
 
@@ -1680,6 +1776,45 @@ static inline void ublk_prep_cancel(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	io_uring_cmd_mark_cancelable(cmd, issue_flags);
 }
 
+static void ublk_io_buf_giveback_cb(const struct io_mapped_buf *buf)
+{
+	struct ublk_rq_data *data = container_of(buf, struct ublk_rq_data, buf[0]);
+	struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(data);
+	struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
+
+	ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
+}
+
+static int ublk_provide_io_buf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
+		struct ublk_queue *ubq, int tag)
+{
+	struct ublk_device *ub = cmd->file->private_data;
+	struct ublk_rq_data *data;
+	struct request *req;
+
+	if (!ub)
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	req = __ublk_check_and_get_req(ub, ubq, tag, 0);
+	if (!req)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pr_devel("%s: qid %d tag %u request bytes %u\n",
+			__func__, tag, ubq->q_id, blk_rq_bytes(req));
+
+	data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+
+	/*
+	 * io_uring guarantees that the callback will be called after
+	 * the provided buffer is consumed, and it is automatic removal
+	 * before this uring command is freed.
+	 *
+	 * This request won't be completed unless the callback is called,
+	 * so ublk module won't be unloaded too.
+	 */
+	return io_uring_cmd_lease_kbuf(cmd, data->buf);
+}
+
 static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 			       unsigned int issue_flags,
 			       const struct ublksrv_io_cmd *ub_cmd)
@@ -1731,6 +1866,10 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 
 	ret = -EINVAL;
 	switch (_IOC_NR(cmd_op)) {
+	case UBLK_IO_PROVIDE_IO_BUF:
+		if (unlikely(!ublk_support_zc(ubq)))
+			goto out;
+		return ublk_provide_io_buf(cmd, ubq, tag);
 	case UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ:
 		/* UBLK_IO_FETCH_REQ is only allowed before queue is setup */
 		if (ublk_queue_ready(ubq)) {
@@ -2149,11 +2288,14 @@ static void ublk_align_max_io_size(struct ublk_device *ub)
 
 static int ublk_add_tag_set(struct ublk_device *ub)
 {
+	int zc = !!(ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY);
+	struct ublk_rq_data *data;
+
 	ub->tag_set.ops = &ublk_mq_ops;
 	ub->tag_set.nr_hw_queues = ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues;
 	ub->tag_set.queue_depth = ub->dev_info.queue_depth;
 	ub->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
-	ub->tag_set.cmd_size = sizeof(struct ublk_rq_data);
+	ub->tag_set.cmd_size = struct_size(data, buf, zc);
 	ub->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
 	ub->tag_set.driver_data = ub;
 	return blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(&ub->tag_set);
@@ -2458,8 +2600,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
 		goto out_free_dev_number;
 	}
 
-	/* We are not ready to support zero copy */
-	ub->dev_info.flags &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
+	/* zero copy depends on user copy */
+	if ((ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY) &&
+			!ublk_dev_is_user_copy(ub)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_free_dev_number;
+	}
 
 	ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues = min_t(unsigned int,
 			ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, nr_cpu_ids);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
index 12873639ea96..04d73b349709 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@
 	_IOWR('u', UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ, struct ublksrv_io_cmd)
 #define	UBLK_U_IO_NEED_GET_DATA		\
 	_IOWR('u', UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA, struct ublksrv_io_cmd)
+#define	UBLK_U_IO_PROVIDE_IO_BUF	\
+	_IOWR('u', 0x23, struct ublksrv_io_cmd)
 
 /* only ABORT means that no re-fetch */
 #define UBLK_IO_RES_OK			0
@@ -127,9 +129,12 @@
 #define UBLKSRV_IO_BUF_TOTAL_SIZE	(1ULL << UBLKSRV_IO_BUF_TOTAL_BITS)
 
 /*
- * zero copy requires 4k block size, and can remap ublk driver's io
- * request into ublksrv's vm space
- */
+ * io_uring provide kbuf command based zero copy
+ *
+ * Not available for UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV, because we rely on ublk
+ * server to fill up request buffer for READ IO, and ublk server can't
+ * be trusted in case of UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV.
+*/
 #define UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY	(1ULL << 0)
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-06 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-06 12:26 [PATCH V9 0/7] io_uring: support group buffer & ublk zc Ming Lei
2024-11-06 12:26 ` [PATCH V9 1/7] io_uring: rename io_mapped_ubuf as io_mapped_buf Ming Lei
2024-11-06 12:26 ` [PATCH V9 2/7] io_uring: rename ubuf of io_mapped_buf as start Ming Lei
2024-11-06 15:07   ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-06 12:26 ` [PATCH V9 3/7] io_uring: shrink io_mapped_buf Ming Lei
2024-11-06 15:09   ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-07  1:04     ` Ming Lei
2024-11-07  2:13       ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-06 12:26 ` [PATCH V9 4/7] io_uring: reuse io_mapped_buf for kernel buffer Ming Lei
2024-11-06 15:15   ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-07  1:22     ` Ming Lei
2024-11-07  2:16       ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-06 12:26 ` [PATCH V9 5/7] io_uring: support leased group buffer with REQ_F_GROUP_BUF Ming Lei
2024-11-06 15:17   ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-06 12:26 ` [PATCH V9 6/7] io_uring/uring_cmd: support leasing device kernel buffer to io_uring Ming Lei
2024-11-06 12:26 ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox