public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Anuj Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
	Anuj gupta <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send metadata along with read/write
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:44:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107104000.GB9730@green245>

> +/*
> + * If sqe->ext_cap is set to this for IORING_OP_READ/WRITE, then the SQE
> + * contains protection information, and ring needs to be setup with SQE128
> + */
> +#define EXT_CAP_PI	(1U << 0)
> +
> +/* Second half of SQE128 for IORING_OP_READ/WRITE */
> +struct io_uring_sqe_ext {
> +	/*
> +	 * Reserved space for extended capabilities that are added down the
> +	 * line. Kept in beginning to maintain contiguity with the free space
> +	 * in first SQE
> +	 */
> +	__u64	rsvd0[4];

Thanks for documenting the design decision.  But I still don't understand
it.  Due to the layout it will be a bit hard to have fields spreading
form the "normal" SQE into the extended area anyway.  Note that this
is not a rejection of the approach, but I don't understand the argument
for it.

> +	/* only valid when EXT_CAP_PI is set */
> +	__u16	flags;
> +	__u16	pi_app_tag;
> +	__u32	pi_len;
> +	__u64	pi_addr;
> +	__u64	pi_seed;
> +	__u64	rsvd1;

.. but either way it would probably make sense to keep the reserved
areas together instead of spread out.

Otherwise this looks good to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20241106122631epcas5p2575c59b7634e0077f8e5c654b5fd5dbb@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122656epcas5p2aa5c312dd186b125b7c3f1af199b46d8@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122659epcas5p28505a2288f3ac24408aaf138ac053793@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 02/10] block: copy back bounce buffer to user-space correctly in case of split Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122701epcas5p379d6d2c0f7a758f959e02a363ee6871d@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 03/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122704epcas5p37a156fb2738c3b8194e8f81c26a07878@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 04/10] fs, iov_iter: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122707epcas5p4569e1ddc2ded4de5da6663fb7ffc9464@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 05/10] fs: introduce IOCB_HAS_METADATA for metadata Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122710epcas5p2b314c865f8333c890dd6f22cf2edbe2f@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send metadata along with read/write Anuj Gupta
2024-11-07  5:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-07  7:26         ` Anuj gupta
2024-11-07  7:38           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-07 10:40             ` Anuj Gupta
2024-11-07 11:44               ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-11-12  0:54           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-11-12  6:51             ` Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122713epcas5p433c4b14f82da79176c3e8bf6835054fe@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122715epcas5p1ccc25dc0bbfae6db881fecb6bd00d5e0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 08/10] nvme: add support for passing on the application tag Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122718epcas5p184094be8de895aa606170da9f4204ae0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 09/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241106122721epcas5p3849e3582fcb6547be2b1b10b031138d4@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18     ` [PATCH v8 10/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox