From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Anuj Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
Anuj gupta <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send metadata along with read/write
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:44:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107104000.GB9730@green245>
> +/*
> + * If sqe->ext_cap is set to this for IORING_OP_READ/WRITE, then the SQE
> + * contains protection information, and ring needs to be setup with SQE128
> + */
> +#define EXT_CAP_PI (1U << 0)
> +
> +/* Second half of SQE128 for IORING_OP_READ/WRITE */
> +struct io_uring_sqe_ext {
> + /*
> + * Reserved space for extended capabilities that are added down the
> + * line. Kept in beginning to maintain contiguity with the free space
> + * in first SQE
> + */
> + __u64 rsvd0[4];
Thanks for documenting the design decision. But I still don't understand
it. Due to the layout it will be a bit hard to have fields spreading
form the "normal" SQE into the extended area anyway. Note that this
is not a rejection of the approach, but I don't understand the argument
for it.
> + /* only valid when EXT_CAP_PI is set */
> + __u16 flags;
> + __u16 pi_app_tag;
> + __u32 pi_len;
> + __u64 pi_addr;
> + __u64 pi_seed;
> + __u64 rsvd1;
.. but either way it would probably make sense to keep the reserved
areas together instead of spread out.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20241106122631epcas5p2575c59b7634e0077f8e5c654b5fd5dbb@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122656epcas5p2aa5c312dd186b125b7c3f1af199b46d8@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122659epcas5p28505a2288f3ac24408aaf138ac053793@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] block: copy back bounce buffer to user-space correctly in case of split Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122701epcas5p379d6d2c0f7a758f959e02a363ee6871d@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122704epcas5p37a156fb2738c3b8194e8f81c26a07878@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] fs, iov_iter: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122707epcas5p4569e1ddc2ded4de5da6663fb7ffc9464@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] fs: introduce IOCB_HAS_METADATA for metadata Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122710epcas5p2b314c865f8333c890dd6f22cf2edbe2f@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send metadata along with read/write Anuj Gupta
2024-11-07 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-07 7:26 ` Anuj gupta
2024-11-07 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-07 10:40 ` Anuj Gupta
2024-11-07 11:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-11-12 0:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-11-12 6:51 ` Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122713epcas5p433c4b14f82da79176c3e8bf6835054fe@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122715epcas5p1ccc25dc0bbfae6db881fecb6bd00d5e0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] nvme: add support for passing on the application tag Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122718epcas5p184094be8de895aa606170da9f4204ae0@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241106122721epcas5p3849e3582fcb6547be2b1b10b031138d4@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-06 12:18 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox