From: Ferry Meng <[email protected]>
To: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <[email protected]>,
Jason Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>,
Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>,
Ferry Meng <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support for virtio-blk
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 20:14:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
We seek to develop a more flexible way to use virtio-blk and bypass the block
layer logic in order to accomplish certain performance optimizations. As a
result, we referred to the implementation of io_uring passthrough in NVMe
and implemented it in the virtio-blk driver. This patch series adds io_uring
passthrough support for virtio-blk devices, resulting in lower submit latency
and increased flexibility when utilizing virtio-blk.
To test this patch series, I changed fio's code:
1. Added virtio-blk support to engines/io_uring.c.
2. Added virtio-blk support to the t/io_uring.c testing tool.
Link: https://github.com/jdmfr/fio
Using t/io_uring-vblk, the performance of virtio-blk based on uring-cmd
scales better than block device access. (such as below, Virtio-Blk with QEMU,
1-depth fio)
(passthru) read: IOPS=17.2k, BW=67.4MiB/s (70.6MB/s)
slat (nsec): min=2907, max=43592, avg=3981.87, stdev=595.10
clat (usec): min=38, max=285,avg=53.47, stdev= 8.28
lat (usec): min=44, max=288, avg=57.45, stdev= 8.28
(block) read: IOPS=15.3k, BW=59.8MiB/s (62.7MB/s)
slat (nsec): min=3408, max=35366, avg=5102.17, stdev=790.79
clat (usec): min=35, max=343, avg=59.63, stdev=10.26
lat (usec): min=43, max=349, avg=64.73, stdev=10.21
Testing the virtio-blk device with fio using 'engines=io_uring_cmd'
and 'engines=io_uring' also demonstrates improvements in submit latency.
(passthru) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u1 /dev/vdcc0
IOPS=189.80K, BW=741MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
IOPS=187.68K, BW=733MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
(block) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u0 /dev/vdc
IOPS=101.51K, BW=396MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
IOPS=100.01K, BW=390MiB/s, IOS/call=4/4
The performance overhead of submitting IO can be decreased by 25% overall
with this patch series. The implementation primarily references 'nvme io_uring
passthrough', supporting io_uring_cmd through a separate character interface
(temporarily named /dev/vdXc0). Since this is an early version, many
details need to be taken into account and redesigned, like:
● Currently, it only considers READ/WRITE scenarios, some more complex operations
not included like discard or zone ops.(Normal sqe64 is sufficient, in my opinion;
following upgrades, sqe128 and cqe32 might not be needed).
● ......
I would appreciate any useful recommendations.
Ferry Meng (3):
virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support.
virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev.
virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support.
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 325 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 16 ++
2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 12:14 Ferry Meng [this message]
2024-12-03 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support Ferry Meng
2024-12-03 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev Ferry Meng
2024-12-04 15:19 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-03 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support Ferry Meng
2024-12-04 21:47 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support for virtio-blk Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox