From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 11/12] nvme: register fdp parameters with the block layer
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:18:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> +static int nvme_check_fdp(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct nvme_ns_info *info,
> + u8 fdp_idx)
Maybe nvme_query_fdp_runs or something else that makes it clear this
is trying to find the runs field might make sense to name this a little
bit more descriptively.
> +{
> + struct nvme_fdp_config_log hdr, *h;
> + struct nvme_fdp_config_desc *desc;
> + size_t size = sizeof(hdr);
> + int i, n, ret;
> + void *log;
> +
> + info->runs = 0;
> + ret = nvme_get_log_lsi(ns->ctrl, 0, NVME_LOG_FDP_CONFIGS, 0, NVME_CSI_NVM,
Overly long line here, and same for the second call below.
> + (void *)&hdr, size, 0, info->endgid);
And this cast isn't actually needed.
> + n = le16_to_cpu(h->numfdpc) + 1;
> + if (fdp_idx > n)
> + goto out;
> +
> + log = h + 1;
> + do {
> + desc = log;
> + log += le16_to_cpu(desc->dsze);
> + } while (i++ < fdp_idx);
Maybe a for loop makes it easier to avoid the uninitialized variable,
e.g.
for (i = 0; i < fdp_index; i++) {
..
> + if (ns->ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_FDPS) {
> + ret = nvme_query_fdp_info(ns, info);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(ns->ctrl->device,
> + "FDP failure status:0x%x\n", ret);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + }
Looking at the full series with the next patch applied I'm a bit
confused about the handling when rescanning. AFAIK the code now always
goes into nvme_query_fdp_info when NVME_CTRL_ATTR_FDPS even if
head->plids/head->nr_plids is already set, and that will then simply
override them, even if they were already set.
Also the old freeing of head->plids in nvme_free_ns_head seems gone in
this version.
Last not but least "FDP failure" is probably not a very helpful message
when it could come from about half a dozen different commands sent to
the device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 22:17 [PATCHv12 00/12] block write streams with nvme fdp Keith Busch
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 01/12] fs: add write stream information to statx Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241209115219epcas5p4cfc217e25d977cd87025a4284ba0436c@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-09 11:44 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 02/12] fs: add a write stream field to the kiocb Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-09 12:47 ` [PATCHv12 01/12] fs: add write stream information to statx Christian Brauner
[not found] ` <CGME20241210073225epcas5p4b2ed325714e6d17fae9e3e45b8e963f6@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 7:24 ` [PATCHv12 02/12] fs: add a write stream field to the kiocb Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 03/12] block: add a bi_write_stream field Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210074213epcas5p22330d197c3e7058e9c2226f28fdb1475@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 7:34 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 04/12] block: introduce max_write_streams queue limit Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210074628epcas5p3e36c7615cf2a5160d7fe169774fd30db@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 7:38 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 05/12] block: introduce a write_stream_granularity " Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210075259epcas5p23bbb79cdb18ddbfad337d764d4fe75da@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 7:45 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 06/12] block: expose write streams for block device nodes Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241209110649epcas5p41df7db0f7ea58f250da647106d25134b@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-09 10:58 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 07/12] io_uring: enable per-io write streams Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 08/12] nvme: add a nvme_get_log_lsi helper Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210121958epcas5p27d14abfca66757a2c42ec71895b008b1@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 12:12 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 09/12] nvme: pass a void pointer to nvme_get/set_features for the result Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210122137epcas5p2e373baa1c99b78341928cc7bf0fe3bdf@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 12:13 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 10/12] nvme.h: add FDP definitions Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210122702epcas5p4fe3ed43ad714c6b467a35d16135d07c5@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 12:19 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:18 ` [PATCHv12 11/12] nvme: register fdp parameters with the block layer Keith Busch
2024-12-09 4:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-09 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-09 8:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-09 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-12-09 16:29 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-10 8:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-12-10 15:23 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-06 22:18 ` [PATCHv12 12/12] nvme: use fdp streams if write stream is provided Keith Busch
2024-12-09 8:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <CGME20241210073523epcas5p149482220b87ff3926fb8864ff1660e0c@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 7:27 ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-09 12:55 ` [PATCHv12 00/12] block write streams with nvme fdp Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-09 16:07 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-10 1:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-12-10 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox