public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 11/12] nvme: register fdp parameters with the block layer
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:18:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> +static int nvme_check_fdp(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct nvme_ns_info *info,
> +			  u8 fdp_idx)

Maybe nvme_query_fdp_runs or something else that makes it clear this
is trying to find the runs field might make sense to name this a little
bit more descriptively.



> +{
> +	struct nvme_fdp_config_log hdr, *h;
> +	struct nvme_fdp_config_desc *desc;
> +	size_t size = sizeof(hdr);
> +	int i, n, ret;
> +	void *log;
> +
> +	info->runs = 0;
> +	ret = nvme_get_log_lsi(ns->ctrl, 0, NVME_LOG_FDP_CONFIGS, 0, NVME_CSI_NVM,

Overly long line here, and same for the second call below.

> +			   (void *)&hdr, size, 0, info->endgid);

And this cast isn't actually needed.

> +	n = le16_to_cpu(h->numfdpc) + 1;
> +	if (fdp_idx > n)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	log = h + 1;
> +	do {
> +		desc = log;
> +		log += le16_to_cpu(desc->dsze);
> +	} while (i++ < fdp_idx);

Maybe a for loop makes it easier to avoid the uninitialized variable,
e.g.

	for (i = 0; i < fdp_index; i++) {
		..

> +	if (ns->ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_FDPS) {
> +		ret = nvme_query_fdp_info(ns, info);
> +		if (ret)
> +			dev_warn(ns->ctrl->device,
> +				"FDP failure status:0x%x\n", ret);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto out;
> +	}

Looking at the full series with the next patch applied I'm a bit
confused about the handling when rescanning.  AFAIK the code now always
goes into nvme_query_fdp_info when NVME_CTRL_ATTR_FDPS even if
head->plids/head->nr_plids is already set, and that will then simply
override them, even if they were already set.

Also the old freeing of head->plids in nvme_free_ns_head seems gone in
this version.

Last not but least "FDP failure" is probably not a very helpful message
when it could come from about half a dozen different commands sent to
the device.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-09 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06 22:17 [PATCHv12 00/12] block write streams with nvme fdp Keith Busch
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 01/12] fs: add write stream information to statx Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241209115219epcas5p4cfc217e25d977cd87025a4284ba0436c@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-09 11:44     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 02/12] fs: add a write stream field to the kiocb Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-09 12:47   ` [PATCHv12 01/12] fs: add write stream information to statx Christian Brauner
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210073225epcas5p4b2ed325714e6d17fae9e3e45b8e963f6@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-10  7:24     ` [PATCHv12 02/12] fs: add a write stream field to the kiocb Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 03/12] block: add a bi_write_stream field Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:26   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210074213epcas5p22330d197c3e7058e9c2226f28fdb1475@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10  7:34     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 04/12] block: introduce max_write_streams queue limit Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210074628epcas5p3e36c7615cf2a5160d7fe169774fd30db@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-12-10  7:38     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 05/12] block: introduce a write_stream_granularity " Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:29   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210075259epcas5p23bbb79cdb18ddbfad337d764d4fe75da@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10  7:45     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 06/12] block: expose write streams for block device nodes Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:30   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241209110649epcas5p41df7db0f7ea58f250da647106d25134b@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-09 10:58     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 07/12] io_uring: enable per-io write streams Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:31   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 08/12] nvme: add a nvme_get_log_lsi helper Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:31   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210121958epcas5p27d14abfca66757a2c42ec71895b008b1@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 12:12     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 09/12] nvme: pass a void pointer to nvme_get/set_features for the result Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:32   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210122137epcas5p2e373baa1c99b78341928cc7bf0fe3bdf@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 12:13     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:17 ` [PATCHv12 10/12] nvme.h: add FDP definitions Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:33   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210122702epcas5p4fe3ed43ad714c6b467a35d16135d07c5@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-12-10 12:19     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-06 22:18 ` [PATCHv12 11/12] nvme: register fdp parameters with the block layer Keith Busch
2024-12-09  4:05   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-09 12:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-09  8:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-09 13:18   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-12-09 16:29     ` Keith Busch
2024-12-10  8:45   ` Dan Carpenter
2024-12-10 15:23     ` Keith Busch
2024-12-06 22:18 ` [PATCHv12 12/12] nvme: use fdp streams if write stream is provided Keith Busch
2024-12-09  8:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]   ` <CGME20241210073523epcas5p149482220b87ff3926fb8864ff1660e0c@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-12-10  7:27     ` Nitesh Shetty
2024-12-09 12:55 ` [PATCHv12 00/12] block write streams with nvme fdp Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-09 16:07   ` Keith Busch
2024-12-10  1:49     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-12-10  7:19     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox