From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
To: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>,
Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>,
Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
WangYuli <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] sock_poll_wait: kill the no longer necessary barrier after poll_wait()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:27:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Now that poll_wait() provides a full barrier we can remove smp_mb() from
sock_poll_wait().
Also, the poll_does_not_wait() check before poll_wait() just adds the
unnecessary confusion, kill it. poll_wait() does the same "p && p->_qproc"
check.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
---
include/net/sock.h | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 7464e9f9f47c..305f3ae5edc2 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2291,7 +2291,7 @@ static inline bool skwq_has_sleeper(struct socket_wq *wq)
}
/**
- * sock_poll_wait - place memory barrier behind the poll_wait call.
+ * sock_poll_wait - wrapper for the poll_wait call.
* @filp: file
* @sock: socket to wait on
* @p: poll_table
@@ -2301,15 +2301,12 @@ static inline bool skwq_has_sleeper(struct socket_wq *wq)
static inline void sock_poll_wait(struct file *filp, struct socket *sock,
poll_table *p)
{
- if (!poll_does_not_wait(p)) {
- poll_wait(filp, &sock->wq.wait, p);
- /* We need to be sure we are in sync with the
- * socket flags modification.
- *
- * This memory barrier is paired in the wq_has_sleeper.
- */
- smp_mb();
- }
+ /* Provides a barrier we need to be sure we are in sync
+ * with the socket flags modification.
+ *
+ * This memory barrier is paired in the wq_has_sleeper.
+ */
+ poll_wait(filp, &sock->wq.wait, p);
}
static inline void skb_set_hash_from_sk(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 16:26 [PATCH 0/5] poll_wait: add mb() to fix theoretical race between waitqueue_active() and .poll() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] poll_wait: kill the obsolete wait_address check Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring_poll: kill the no longer necessary barrier after poll_wait() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] poll: kill poll_does_not_wait() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 17:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] poll_wait: add mb() to fix theoretical race between waitqueue_active() and .poll() Linus Torvalds
2025-01-07 22:55 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-10 10:56 ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-10 11:00 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox