From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PATCHSET for-next 0/3] Fix read/write -EAGAIN failure cases
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:15:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
Hi,
After I had originally ensured that all read/write requests were
fully retryable (with the 6.10 "always allocate async data" changes),
there was an attempt or two at getting rid of these -EAGAIN's bubbling
back to userspace. See:
commit 039a2e800bcd5beb89909d1a488abf3d647642cf
Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Apr 25 09:04:32 2024 -0600
io_uring/rw: reinstate thread check for retries
and the other two commits it references.
Here's another attempt, which simply moves this kind of checking to
be at completion time. This solves the issue of REQ_F_REISSUE being
missed in case it gets sets outside of submission context, and
generally just cleans up the random REQ_F_REISSUE checking that
otherwise needs to happen for the read/write issue path.
Patch 1 is just a cleanup, patch 2 does the actual change, and patch 3
finally removes the thread group checking in the "Can I resubmit"
checks.
io_uring/io_uring.c | 15 +++++++-
io_uring/rw.c | 89 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 18:15 Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-01-09 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring/rw: use io_rw_recycle() from cleanup path Jens Axboe
2025-01-09 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring/rw: handle -EAGAIN retry at IO completion time Jens Axboe
2025-01-09 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/rw: don't gate retry on completion context Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox