public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Kellermann <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Max Kellermann <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] io_uring/io-wq: eliminate redundant io_work_get_acct() calls
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 14:39:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Instead of calling io_work_get_acct() again, pass acct to
io_wq_insert_work() and io_wq_remove_pending().

This atomic access in io_work_get_acct() was done under the
`acct->lock`, and optimizing it away reduces lock contention a bit.

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <[email protected]>
---
 io_uring/io-wq.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index 5d0928f37471..6d26f6f068af 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -903,9 +903,8 @@ static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work, struct io_wq *wq)
 	} while (work);
 }
 
-static void io_wq_insert_work(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
+static void io_wq_insert_work(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_acct *acct, struct io_wq_work *work)
 {
-	struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wq, work);
 	unsigned int hash;
 	struct io_wq_work *tail;
 
@@ -951,7 +950,7 @@ void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
-	io_wq_insert_work(wq, work);
+	io_wq_insert_work(wq, acct, work);
 	clear_bit(IO_ACCT_STALLED_BIT, &acct->flags);
 	raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
 
@@ -1021,10 +1020,10 @@ static bool io_wq_worker_cancel(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
 }
 
 static inline void io_wq_remove_pending(struct io_wq *wq,
+					struct io_wq_acct *acct,
 					 struct io_wq_work *work,
 					 struct io_wq_work_node *prev)
 {
-	struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wq, work);
 	unsigned int hash = io_get_work_hash(work);
 	struct io_wq_work *prev_work = NULL;
 
@@ -1051,7 +1050,7 @@ static bool io_acct_cancel_pending_work(struct io_wq *wq,
 		work = container_of(node, struct io_wq_work, list);
 		if (!match->fn(work, match->data))
 			continue;
-		io_wq_remove_pending(wq, work, prev);
+		io_wq_remove_pending(wq, acct, work, prev);
 		raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
 		io_run_cancel(work, wq);
 		match->nr_pending++;
-- 
2.45.2


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-28 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28 13:39 [PATCH 0/8] Various io_uring micro-optimizations (reducing lock contention) Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` Max Kellermann [this message]
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] io_uring/io-wq: add io_worker.acct pointer Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] io_uring/io-wq: move worker lists to struct io_wq_acct Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] io_uring/io-wq: cache work->flags in variable Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 18:57   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-29 19:11     ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 23:41       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-30  5:36         ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-30 14:57           ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-31 14:06             ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-30 14:54         ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] io_uring/io-wq: do not use bogus hash value Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] io_uring/io-wq: pass io_wq to io_get_next_work() Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] io_uring: cache io_kiocb->flags in variable Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 19:11   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] io_uring: skip redundant poll wakeups Max Kellermann
2025-01-31 13:54   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 17:16     ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-31 17:25       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-29 17:18 ` [PATCH 0/8] Various io_uring micro-optimizations (reducing lock contention) Jens Axboe
2025-01-29 17:39   ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 17:45     ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-29 18:01       ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-31 16:13         ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-01 15:25           ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-01 15:30             ` Max Kellermann
2025-02-01 15:38               ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-29 19:30     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-29 19:43       ` Max Kellermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox