From: Max Kellermann <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Max Kellermann <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] io_uring/io-wq: eliminate redundant io_work_get_acct() calls
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 14:39:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Instead of calling io_work_get_acct() again, pass acct to
io_wq_insert_work() and io_wq_remove_pending().
This atomic access in io_work_get_acct() was done under the
`acct->lock`, and optimizing it away reduces lock contention a bit.
Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io-wq.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index 5d0928f37471..6d26f6f068af 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -903,9 +903,8 @@ static void io_run_cancel(struct io_wq_work *work, struct io_wq *wq)
} while (work);
}
-static void io_wq_insert_work(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
+static void io_wq_insert_work(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_acct *acct, struct io_wq_work *work)
{
- struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wq, work);
unsigned int hash;
struct io_wq_work *tail;
@@ -951,7 +950,7 @@ void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
}
raw_spin_lock(&acct->lock);
- io_wq_insert_work(wq, work);
+ io_wq_insert_work(wq, acct, work);
clear_bit(IO_ACCT_STALLED_BIT, &acct->flags);
raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
@@ -1021,10 +1020,10 @@ static bool io_wq_worker_cancel(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
}
static inline void io_wq_remove_pending(struct io_wq *wq,
+ struct io_wq_acct *acct,
struct io_wq_work *work,
struct io_wq_work_node *prev)
{
- struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wq, work);
unsigned int hash = io_get_work_hash(work);
struct io_wq_work *prev_work = NULL;
@@ -1051,7 +1050,7 @@ static bool io_acct_cancel_pending_work(struct io_wq *wq,
work = container_of(node, struct io_wq_work, list);
if (!match->fn(work, match->data))
continue;
- io_wq_remove_pending(wq, work, prev);
+ io_wq_remove_pending(wq, acct, work, prev);
raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
io_run_cancel(work, wq);
match->nr_pending++;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-28 13:39 [PATCH 0/8] Various io_uring micro-optimizations (reducing lock contention) Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` Max Kellermann [this message]
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] io_uring/io-wq: add io_worker.acct pointer Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] io_uring/io-wq: move worker lists to struct io_wq_acct Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] io_uring/io-wq: cache work->flags in variable Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 18:57 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-29 19:11 ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 23:41 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-30 5:36 ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-30 14:57 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-31 14:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-30 14:54 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] io_uring/io-wq: do not use bogus hash value Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] io_uring/io-wq: pass io_wq to io_get_next_work() Max Kellermann
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] io_uring: cache io_kiocb->flags in variable Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 19:11 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] io_uring: skip redundant poll wakeups Max Kellermann
2025-01-31 13:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-31 17:16 ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-31 17:25 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-29 17:18 ` [PATCH 0/8] Various io_uring micro-optimizations (reducing lock contention) Jens Axboe
2025-01-29 17:39 ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-29 17:45 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-29 18:01 ` Max Kellermann
2025-01-31 16:13 ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-01 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-01 15:30 ` Max Kellermann
2025-02-01 15:38 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-29 19:30 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-29 19:43 ` Max Kellermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox