From: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
To: Ferry Meng <[email protected]>
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <[email protected]>,
Jason Wang <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
Joseph Qi <[email protected]>,
Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support.
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:57:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250227065711.GB85709@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3979 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 07:10:36PM +0800, Ferry Meng wrote:
>
> On 2/19/25 10:01 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:24:32PM +0800, Ferry Meng wrote:
> > > This patchset implements io_uring passthrough surppot in virtio-blk
> > > driver, bypass vfs and part of block layer logic, resulting in lower
> > > submit latency and increased flexibility when utilizing virtio-blk.
> > Hi,
> > What is the status of this patch series?
> >
> > Stefan
>
> I apologize for the delayed response. It seems that the maintainer has not
> yet provided feedback on this patch series, and I was actually waiting for
> his comments before proceeding. I have received the feedback from the other
> reviewers & have already discovered some obvious mistakes in v1 series.
>
>
> Although I'm occupied with other tasks recently, I expect to send out v2
> patches *in a week*.
Great. I'll review the next revision in more detail.
Thanks,
Stefan
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> > > In this version, currently only supports READ/WRITE vec/no-vec operations,
> > > others like discard or zoned ops not considered in. So the userspace-related
> > > struct is not complicated.
> > >
> > > struct virtblk_uring_cmd {
> > > __u32 type;
> > > __u32 ioprio;
> > > __u64 sector;
> > > /* above is related to out_hdr */
> > > __u64 data; // user buffer addr or iovec base addr.
> > > __u32 data_len; // user buffer length or iovec count.
> > > __u32 flag; // only contains whether a vector rw or not.
> > > };
> > >
> > > To test this patch series, I changed fio's code:
> > > 1. Added virtio-blk support to engines/io_uring.c.
> > > 2. Added virtio-blk support to the t/io_uring.c testing tool.
> > > Link: https://github.com/jdmfr/fio
> > >
> > >
> > > ===========
> > > Performance
> > > ===========
> > >
> > > Using t/io_uring-vblk, the performance of virtio-blk based on uring-cmd
> > > scales better than block device access. (such as below, Virtio-Blk with QEMU,
> > > 1-depth fio)
> > > (passthru) read: IOPS=17.2k, BW=67.4MiB/s (70.6MB/s)
> > > slat (nsec): min=2907, max=43592, avg=3981.87, stdev=595.10
> > > clat (usec): min=38, max=285,avg=53.47, stdev= 8.28
> > > lat (usec): min=44, max=288, avg=57.45, stdev= 8.28
> > > (block) read: IOPS=15.3k, BW=59.8MiB/s (62.7MB/s)
> > > slat (nsec): min=3408, max=35366, avg=5102.17, stdev=790.79
> > > clat (usec): min=35, max=343, avg=59.63, stdev=10.26
> > > lat (usec): min=43, max=349, avg=64.73, stdev=10.21
> > >
> > > Testing the virtio-blk device with fio using 'engines=io_uring_cmd'
> > > and 'engines=io_uring' also demonstrates improvements in submit latency.
> > > (passthru) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u1 /dev/vdcc0
> > > IOPS=189.80K, BW=741MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
> > > IOPS=187.68K, BW=733MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
> > > (block) taskset -c 0 t/io_uring-vblk -b4096 -d8 -c4 -s4 -p0 -F1 -B0 -O0 -n1 -u0 /dev/vdc
> > > IOPS=101.51K, BW=396MiB/s, IOS/call=4/3
> > > IOPS=100.01K, BW=390MiB/s, IOS/call=4/4
> > >
> > > =======
> > > Changes
> > > =======
> > >
> > > Changes in v1:
> > > --------------
> > > * remove virtblk_is_write() helper
> > > * fix rq_flags type definition (blk_opf_t), add REQ_ALLOC_CACHE flag.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
> > >
> > > RFC discussion:
> > > ---------------
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/
> > >
> > > Ferry Meng (3):
> > > virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support.
> > > virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev.
> > > virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support.
> > >
> > > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 320 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 16 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 331 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.5
> > >
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 9:24 [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support Ferry Meng
2024-12-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-blk: add virtio-blk chardev support Ferry Meng
2024-12-30 7:47 ` Joseph Qi
2025-01-07 4:53 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-12-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd support for I/O passthru on chardev Ferry Meng
2024-12-30 8:00 ` Joseph Qi
2025-01-07 13:14 ` lizetao
2025-02-26 12:04 ` Ferry Meng
2024-12-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] virtio-blk: add uring_cmd iopoll support Ferry Meng
2025-01-09 17:27 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] virtio-blk: add io_uring passthrough support Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-02-19 2:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-02-26 11:10 ` Ferry Meng
2025-02-27 6:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250227065711.GB85709@fedora \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox