public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: mark exit side kworkers as task_work capable
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:55:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250411-reinreden-nester-8cd21e845563@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409134057.198671-3-axboe@kernel.dk>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 07:35:20AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> There are two types of work here:
> 
> 1) Fallback work, if the task is exiting
> 2) The exit side cancelations
> 
> and both of them may do the final fput() of a file. When this happens,
> fput() will schedule delayed work. This slows down exits when io_uring

I was a bit surprised by this because it means that all those __fput()s
are done with kthread credentials which is a bit surprising (but
harmless afaict).

> needs to wait for that work to finish. It is possible to flush this via
> flush_delayed_fput(), but that's a big hammer as other unrelated files
> could be involved, and from other tasks as well.
> 
> Add two io_uring helpers to temporarily clear PF_NO_TASKWORK for the
> worker threads, and run any queued task_work before setting the flag
> again. Then we can ensure we only flush related items that received
> their final fput as part of work cancelation and flushing.

Ok, so the only change is that this isn't offloaded to the global
delayed fput workqueue but to the task work that you're running off of
your kthread helpers.

> 
> For now these are io_uring private, but could obviously be made
> generically available, should there be a need to do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
>  io_uring/io_uring.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index c6209fe44cb1..bff99e185217 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,20 @@ static inline void io_req_add_to_cache(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_ring_ctx
>  	wq_stack_add_head(&req->comp_list, &ctx->submit_state.free_list);
>  }
>  
> +static __cold void io_kworker_tw_start(void)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_NO_TASKWORK)))
> +		return;
> +	current->flags &= ~PF_NO_TASKWORK;
> +}
> +
> +static __cold void io_kworker_tw_end(void)
> +{
> +	while (task_work_pending(current))
> +		task_work_run();
> +	current->flags |= PF_NO_TASKWORK;
> +}
> +
>  static __cold void io_ring_ctx_ref_free(struct percpu_ref *ref)
>  {
>  	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = container_of(ref, struct io_ring_ctx, refs);
> @@ -253,6 +267,8 @@ static __cold void io_fallback_req_func(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct io_kiocb *req, *tmp;
>  	struct io_tw_state ts = {};
>  
> +	io_kworker_tw_start();
> +
>  	percpu_ref_get(&ctx->refs);
>  	mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>  	llist_for_each_entry_safe(req, tmp, node, io_task_work.node)
> @@ -260,6 +276,7 @@ static __cold void io_fallback_req_func(struct work_struct *work)
>  	io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
>  	mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
>  	percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
> +	io_kworker_tw_end();
>  }
>  
>  static int io_alloc_hash_table(struct io_hash_table *table, unsigned bits)
> @@ -2876,6 +2893,8 @@ static __cold void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct io_tctx_node *node;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	io_kworker_tw_start();
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If we're doing polled IO and end up having requests being
>  	 * submitted async (out-of-line), then completions can come in while
> @@ -2932,6 +2951,8 @@ static __cold void io_ring_exit_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		 */
>  	} while (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&ctx->ref_comp, interval));
>  
> +	io_kworker_tw_end();
> +
>  	init_completion(&exit.completion);
>  	init_task_work(&exit.task_work, io_tctx_exit_cb);
>  	exit.ctx = ctx;
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 13:35 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Cancel and wait for all requests on exit Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: gate final fput task_work on PF_NO_TASKWORK Jens Axboe
2025-04-11 13:48   ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-11 14:37     ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-14 10:10       ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-14 14:29         ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-14 17:11   ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-04-14 19:35     ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: mark exit side kworkers as task_work capable Jens Axboe
2025-04-11 13:55   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2025-04-11 14:38     ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: consider ring dead once the ref is marked dying Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: wait for cancelations on final ring put Jens Axboe
2025-04-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: switch away from percpu refcounts Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-21 19:24 [PATCHSET RFC v2 0/5] Cancel and wait for all requests on exit Jens Axboe
2025-03-21 19:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: mark exit side kworkers as task_work capable Jens Axboe
2024-06-04 19:01 [PATCHSET RFC 0/5] Wait on cancelations at release time Jens Axboe
2024-06-04 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: mark exit side kworkers as task_work capable Jens Axboe
2024-06-05 15:01   ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-06-05 18:08     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250411-reinreden-nester-8cd21e845563@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox