From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4DB264FB2; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744625419; cv=none; b=bnvNCPKHXD8Qa3vCNWim9Bfgmbj8R6UV/Jz3W2tbIaioEOkT5Gwp04jxAF/f4QRq+vYRq1MyJQLXyfhpaHIXxLbMt9+qANytOiAIXQtuowG+4lAjvOa6l7ALyGOoPfZihZa6p9CCu3WyyLIlOJB6T/0HbrlltGjKL/O5+pu0Cg4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744625419; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iCioN6LF6iNblfboM6DaqDV8WyMze/RA3c88M9EvxYE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KcspASn6383M/dVpuxcLfW06ujvpNABbnmm7WuR+UTNi69zPEsiNdq8INlkiEL8htlmkNg3SeckAw8DjNDTqIlVb4NFVkpEkaQfqDTxctAZBOtQuImOoC0+dsDrLEzx9S3yMDBn6t35Bl+fY16LlJLe3BOk1mGr2OPEdjtXlTxY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bnnv8NV0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bnnv8NV0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07FC1C4CEE2; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:10:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744625414; bh=iCioN6LF6iNblfboM6DaqDV8WyMze/RA3c88M9EvxYE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bnnv8NV0edc7rpet+ps0Y/FDPgio/eDpwYy/Ue4YEddWXZaQxJHfPqma8nc4cBWnY F2dkQfawoW0tEaJcfT/wBOtOC2vDHyrkOesMqGehqFMX0HWd4/HzpIUyrNpIVtaU2J VJGLX3YrX63AY7fD75ZG0LKiZTgYWGWi7s6tJPvJwarAmejC547d9g1ss45gs+5nfh kUwEupq5Qt1upeLXvsrtHwwWlnFy7R77hgbb3uLBAGb/I7u5STdPHh1ri5uPSWRfxR MWHvEkxo08vUAd9VJD6eZc5pa+6paHENgnhweYPzdQAL6kAke7aKJn57k7YdzGT4XP sZhJwpemVkHhg== Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:10:10 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Jens Axboe Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fs: gate final fput task_work on PF_NO_TASKWORK Message-ID: <20250414-unwiderruflich-daheim-8e14b89e7845@brauner> References: <20250409134057.198671-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <20250409134057.198671-2-axboe@kernel.dk> <20250411-teebeutel-begibt-7d9c0323954b@brauner> <87fcae79-674c-4eea-8e65-4763c6fced44@kernel.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fcae79-674c-4eea-8e65-4763c6fced44@kernel.dk> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:37:51AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/11/25 7:48 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Seems fine. Although it has some potential for abuse. So maybe a > > VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE() that PF_NO_TASKWORK is only used with PF_KTHREAD > > would make sense. > > Can certainly add that. You'd want that before the check for > in_interrupt and PF_NO_TASKWORK? Something ala > > /* PF_NO_TASKWORK should only be used with PF_KTHREAD */ > VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE((task->flags & PF_NO_TASKWORK) && !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)); > > ? Yeah, sounds good!