From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, csander@purestorage.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: pass in struct io_big_cqe to io_alloc_ocqe()
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 14:05:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250516201007.482667-5-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516201007.482667-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
Rather than pass extra1/extra2 separately, just pass in the (now) named
io_big_cqe struct instead. The callers that don't use/support CQE32 will
now just pass a single NULL, rather than two seperate mystery zero
values.
Move the clearing of the big_cqe elements into io_alloc_ocqe() as well,
so it can get moved out of the generic code.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 2 +-
io_uring/io_uring.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 00dbd7cd0e7d..2922635986f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ struct io_kiocb {
const struct cred *creds;
struct io_wq_work work;
- struct {
+ struct io_big_cqe {
u64 extra1;
u64 extra2;
} big_cqe;
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index b50c2d434e74..c66fc4b7356b 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -724,8 +724,8 @@ static bool io_cqring_add_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
}
static struct io_overflow_cqe *io_alloc_ocqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
- struct io_cqe *cqe, u64 extra1,
- u64 extra2, gfp_t gfp)
+ struct io_cqe *cqe,
+ struct io_big_cqe *big_cqe, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
size_t ocq_size = sizeof(struct io_overflow_cqe);
@@ -734,17 +734,19 @@ static struct io_overflow_cqe *io_alloc_ocqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
if (is_cqe32)
ocq_size += sizeof(struct io_uring_cqe);
- ocqe = kmalloc(ocq_size, gfp | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
+ ocqe = kzalloc(ocq_size, gfp | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
trace_io_uring_cqe_overflow(ctx, cqe->user_data, cqe->res, cqe->flags, ocqe);
if (ocqe) {
ocqe->cqe.user_data = cqe->user_data;
ocqe->cqe.res = cqe->res;
ocqe->cqe.flags = cqe->flags;
- if (is_cqe32) {
- ocqe->cqe.big_cqe[0] = extra1;
- ocqe->cqe.big_cqe[1] = extra2;
+ if (is_cqe32 && big_cqe) {
+ ocqe->cqe.big_cqe[0] = big_cqe->extra1;
+ ocqe->cqe.big_cqe[1] = big_cqe->extra2;
}
}
+ if (big_cqe)
+ big_cqe->extra1 = big_cqe->extra2 = 0;
return ocqe;
}
@@ -819,7 +821,7 @@ bool io_post_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags
struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
struct io_cqe cqe = io_init_cqe(user_data, res, cflags);
- ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &cqe, 0, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &cqe, NULL, GFP_ATOMIC);
filled = io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
}
io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
@@ -839,7 +841,7 @@ void io_add_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags)
struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
struct io_cqe cqe = io_init_cqe(user_data, res, cflags);
- ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &cqe, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &cqe, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
@@ -1449,8 +1451,7 @@ void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
gfp_t gfp = ctx->lockless_cq ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_ATOMIC;
struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
- ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &req->cqe, req->big_cqe.extra1,
- req->big_cqe.extra2, gfp);
+ ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &req->cqe, &req->big_cqe, gfp);
if (ctx->lockless_cq) {
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
@@ -1458,7 +1459,6 @@ void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
} else {
io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
}
- memset(&req->big_cqe, 0, sizeof(req->big_cqe));
}
}
__io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 20:05 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Allow non-atomic allocs for overflows Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 20:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: open code io_req_cqe_overflow() Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 20:05 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: split alloc and add of overflow Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 23:00 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-16 20:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: make io_alloc_ocqe() take a struct io_cqe pointer Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 23:07 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-16 23:08 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-16 23:48 ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 20:05 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-05-16 23:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: pass in struct io_big_cqe to io_alloc_ocqe() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-16 20:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add new helpers for posting overflows Jens Axboe
2025-05-16 23:17 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-05-16 23:49 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-17 11:42 [PATCHSET v4 0/5] Allow non-atomic allocs for overflows Jens Axboe
2025-05-17 11:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: pass in struct io_big_cqe to io_alloc_ocqe() Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250516201007.482667-5-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox