[PATCH 5/5] io_uring: add new helpers for posting overflows

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

Add two helpers, one for posting overflows for lockless_cq rings, and
one for non-lockless_cq rings. The former can allocate sanely with
GFP_KERNEL, but needs to grab the completion lock for posting, while the
latter must do non-sleeping allocs as it already holds the completion
lock.

While at it, mark the overflow handling functions as __cold as well, as
they should not generally be called during normal operations of the
ring.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index c66fc4b7356b..52087b079a0c 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -697,8 +697,8 @@ static __cold void io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(struct task_struct *task)
 	}
 }
 
-static bool io_cqring_add_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
-				   struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe)
+static __cold bool io_cqring_add_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+					  struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->completion_lock);
 
@@ -808,6 +808,27 @@ static bool io_fill_cqe_aux(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res,
 	return false;
 }
 
+static __cold void io_cqe_overflow_lockless(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+					    struct io_cqe *cqe,
+					    struct io_big_cqe *big_cqe)
+{
+	struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
+
+	ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, cqe, big_cqe, GFP_KERNEL);
+	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+	io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
+	spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+}
+
+static __cold bool io_cqe_overflow(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_cqe *cqe,
+				   struct io_big_cqe *big_cqe)
+{
+	struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
+
+	ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, cqe, big_cqe, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	return io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
+}
+
 #define io_init_cqe(user_data, res, cflags)	\
 	(struct io_cqe) { .user_data = user_data, .res = res, .flags = cflags }
 
@@ -818,11 +839,9 @@ bool io_post_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags
 	io_cq_lock(ctx);
 	filled = io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, user_data, res, cflags);
 	if (unlikely(!filled)) {
-		struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
 		struct io_cqe cqe = io_init_cqe(user_data, res, cflags);
 
-		ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &cqe, NULL, GFP_ATOMIC);
-		filled = io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
+		filled = io_cqe_overflow(ctx, &cqe, NULL);
 	}
 	io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
 	return filled;
@@ -838,13 +857,9 @@ void io_add_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags)
 	lockdep_assert(ctx->lockless_cq);
 
 	if (!io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, user_data, res, cflags)) {
-		struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
 		struct io_cqe cqe = io_init_cqe(user_data, res, cflags);
 
-		ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &cqe, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
-		spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-		io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
-		spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
+		io_cqe_overflow_lockless(ctx, &cqe, NULL);
 	}
 	ctx->submit_state.cq_flush = true;
 }
@@ -1448,17 +1463,10 @@ void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 		 */
 		if (!(req->flags & (REQ_F_CQE_SKIP | REQ_F_REISSUE)) &&
 		    unlikely(!io_fill_cqe_req(ctx, req))) {
-			gfp_t gfp = ctx->lockless_cq ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_ATOMIC;
-			struct io_overflow_cqe *ocqe;
-
-			ocqe = io_alloc_ocqe(ctx, &req->cqe, &req->big_cqe, gfp);
-			if (ctx->lockless_cq) {
-				spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-				io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
-				spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
-			} else {
-				io_cqring_add_overflow(ctx, ocqe);
-			}
+			if (ctx->lockless_cq)
+				io_cqe_overflow_lockless(ctx, &req->cqe, &req->big_cqe);
+			else
+				io_cqe_overflow(ctx, &req->cqe, &req->big_cqe);
 		}
 	}
 	__io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
-- 
2.49.0