From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67131114; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 00:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754438713; cv=none; b=iJpqvdiworuDeMr7bRmTEkx9lQgblB9QqaigD48bia5Dk3TEAbFzgTrwyFm4abT+b9002nyDHLP5SC5b4H4wm4gDZdUp1xSSz94NALDXbmFO+m9Js2hcnqqy2iFsubcuN50HeBmmLEpbNw7P9i7xGQiSC1s3Vd2k/IHA5wQtofo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754438713; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P00i4GtZejZ/n1LkusAVklmnoOuvCTiojcgIjHQOTpU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ffq63IS3+miDwBJuy7jgf+6HJDgriz2oVMHHlZmQo7KXGTuRLVZxbzhl9jxtIsdGtoU4X2cLKOOtSX4z0S8F0My7roGLkhfc5ZF6iB5/LblSJK2DjL0jK6qHmuz8qydgqbZt5cppfl8XPeQ6TdwOb3/l8vplESz4lnP0X2JSucY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mYaHZHnE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mYaHZHnE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBAF2C4CEF0; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 00:05:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754438713; bh=P00i4GtZejZ/n1LkusAVklmnoOuvCTiojcgIjHQOTpU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mYaHZHnEVHImcBFttT9nh2lADoXszkW+AdmZSkil5HEL4e2a1+R2ILrqvkU3H+9Mr hBue5jzuFH7DSNYJs93mw8wLBxG2o+UIbavu8ahIvHyUy1iGV1gq9uTFXvj09Rffe1 zUviiaDLqTyb0Y8Js+zjglX6sPH6bgk3t2LayL1HRXfdCYnrpYRWKZUy3ZOCyOFqxR DNIjXgMtG8S5fESEE18URYxvJ6C/zaGEfsXGdm8JwHKUkxyB9M/ywItaWTNwO+oQY8 l25Ieyg5ohaXB1PpagR6RdhWICBC038BHNAtwguVNZH8hc20faaFpsD6PIb19ljWs5 6BkG9DItHrtDA== Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:05:12 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Pavel Begunkov Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Willem de Bruijn , Paolo Abeni , andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, sdf@fomichev.me, almasrymina@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk, michael.chan@broadcom.com, dtatulea@nvidia.com, ap420073@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC v1 21/22] net: parametrise mp open with a queue config Message-ID: <20250805170512.37cd1e7e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <11caecf8-5b81-49c7-8b73-847033151d51@gmail.com> References: <20250801171009.6789bf74@kernel.org> <11caecf8-5b81-49c7-8b73-847033151d51@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:50:08 +0100 Pavel Begunkov wrote: > I was thinking stashing it in struct pp_memory_provider_params and > applying in netdev_rx_queue_restart(). Tho, netdev_rx_queue_restart() may not be a great place, it's called from multiple points and more will come. net_mp_open_rxq() / net_mp_close_rxq() and friends are probably a better place to apply and clear MP related overrides.