From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2397223AB81; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 02:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755657088; cv=none; b=UKJ6lN68DdxECgsj+Zy7LffXrYmjZ2xoN0DJa0xXVU7qDVn7GzgHfu0CiV7+OEL/X0PustnYIwrw7x4EFWnCbMDfbCko14nw5UtHnfJpnd/tCrgpjUzPhgHQB3TFcQ3Mehgv7rKAnvRwW4Rj7UHFDWmDf6Htfe4X0vAWs4cxyww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755657088; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Slm/GBRpvflnGfZUhFFb/q0xVw8FcEBmy24cv2K2+T0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rYscvIZbr8bxC/pcuya8ustbo2s8Pc89I63sVJHel1k0c5BrEzY+biDKuzG2338g7AZChoDD0Ll8Oj4/aJl5DoqD6E7TCyrz8cvuVbMN1UxDoaDvHoEnv+ukajrclyv+v4xUWVtm2SsQD3Rs1UxciW2bROr/F1CGag9mJjeGLlY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JPcb2fGh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JPcb2fGh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4555AC4CEF1; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 02:31:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755657087; bh=Slm/GBRpvflnGfZUhFFb/q0xVw8FcEBmy24cv2K2+T0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JPcb2fGh26tvgfOP5ucYqoaoXhV4UPN+S1t6VgF8eWkQtsG72Ypi6cB2qIIHHFHAw 5F2xj+QUjv/sYKsaYM+9fVJykIx5BjdLn9ePoxlOkwrq+ByuXxa1cWjzMyogh/nFHi CAsx7V/eExnovzTfGTPQHjgU8NqSdFWneSZdxzGTWXndkha1rI2WG528kZFlk7OsLT P+UI96T/S0mRxFE3k3ATIRm//1zOSPXidg9e/r1MtF1hegSPy5bEmQ61aTGCyfPKKx CngzEhCiAxoupyk3R6ZjZs+csQrx49hDohjYPtq7zMq+PmLqQdKWdtK6NWQisYotn+ eCJ5lUJeDMH1A== Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 19:31:26 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Pavel Begunkov Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Willem de Bruijn , Paolo Abeni , andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, sdf@fomichev.me, almasrymina@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk, michael.chan@broadcom.com, dtatulea@nvidia.com, ap420073@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/23][pull request] Queue configs and large buffer providers Message-ID: <20250819193126.2a4af62b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:57:16 +0100 Pavel Begunkov wrote: > Jakub Kicinski (20): I think we need to revisit how we operate. When we started the ZC work w/ io-uring I suggested a permanent shared branch. That's perhaps an overkill. What I did not expect is that you will not even CC netdev@ on changes to io_uring/zcrx.* I don't mean to assert any sort of ownership of that code, but you're not meeting basic collaboration standards for the kernel. This needs to change first. -- pw-bot: defer