public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Date: Fri,  5 Sep 2025 11:02:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905090240.102790-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905090240.102790-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.

This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

system_wq is a per-CPU worqueue, yet nothing in its name tells about that
CPU affinity constraint, which is very often not required by users. Make
it clear by adding a system_percpu_wq.

queue_work() / queue_delayed_work() mod_delayed_work() will now use the
new per-cpu wq: whether the user still stick on the old name a warn will
be printed along a wq redirect to the new one.

This patch add the new system_percpu_wq except for mm, fs and net
subsystem, whom are handled in separated patches.

The old wq will be kept for a few release cylces.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index c6209fe44cb1..2a6ead3c7d36 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2986,7 +2986,7 @@ static __cold void io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	 * Use system_unbound_wq to avoid spawning tons of event kworkers
 	 * if we're exiting a ton of rings at the same time. It just adds
 	 * noise and overhead, there's no discernable change in runtime
-	 * over using system_wq.
+	 * over using system_percpu_wq.
 	 */
 	queue_work(iou_wq, &ctx->exit_work);
 }
-- 
2.51.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05  9:02 [PATCH 0/2] io_uring: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users Marco Crivellari
2025-09-05  9:02 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-09-05  9:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-09-09 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] io_uring: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users Jens Axboe
2025-09-09 15:13   ` Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250905090240.102790-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox