* [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock
@ 2025-10-29 23:16 David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei
2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring, netdev
Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman
netdev ops must be called under instance lock or rtnl_lock, but
io_register_zcrx_ifq() isn't doing this for netdev_queue_get_dma_dev().
Fix this by taking the instance lock using netdev_get_by_index_lock().
netdev_get_by_index_lock() isn't exported by default, so the first patch
is a prep patch to export this under linux/netdevice.h.
Extended the instance lock section to include attaching a memory
provider. Could not move io_zcrx_create_area() outside, since the dmabuf
codepath IORING_ZCRX_AREA_DMABUF requires ifq->dev. Happy to do whatever
here, either keep this extended section or relock for net_mp_open_rxq().
v2:
- add Fixes tag
- export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
- use netdev_get_by_index_lock() + netdev_hold()
- extend lock section to include net_mp_open_rxq()
David Wei (2):
net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock()
net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance
lock
include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
io_uring/zcrx.c | 15 +++++++++------
net/core/dev.c | 1 +
net/core/dev.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() 2025-10-29 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 ` David Wei 2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski 2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring, netdev Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman Need to call netdev_get_by_index_lock() from io_uring/zcrx.c, but it is currently private to net. Export the function in linux/netdevice.h. Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk> --- include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 + net/core/dev.c | 1 + net/core/dev.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index d1a687444b27..77c46a2823ec 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -3401,6 +3401,7 @@ struct net_device *dev_get_by_index(struct net *net, int ifindex); struct net_device *__dev_get_by_index(struct net *net, int ifindex); struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index(struct net *net, int ifindex, netdevice_tracker *tracker, gfp_t gfp); +struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex); struct net_device *netdev_get_by_name(struct net *net, const char *name, netdevice_tracker *tracker, gfp_t gfp); struct net_device *netdev_get_by_flags_rcu(struct net *net, netdevice_tracker *tracker, diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 2acfa44927da..7e4ef9a915f9 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -1089,6 +1089,7 @@ struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex) return __netdev_put_lock(dev, net); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_get_by_index_lock); struct net_device * netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(struct net *net, int ifindex) diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h index 900880e8b5b4..df8a90fe89f8 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.h +++ b/net/core/dev.h @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct napi_struct * netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id); struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id); -struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex); struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net); struct net_device * netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev, -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() 2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-10-29 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Wei Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:53 -0700 David Wei wrote: > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_get_by_index_lock); I don't think io_uring can be a module? No need to export ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() 2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: David Wei @ 2025-10-30 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman On 2025-10-29 16:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:53 -0700 David Wei wrote: >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_get_by_index_lock); > > I don't think io_uring can be a module? No need to export Got it, will remove. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock 2025-10-29 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei 2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 ` David Wei 2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring, netdev Cc: Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman netdev ops must be called under instance lock or rtnl_lock, but io_register_zcrx_ifq() isn't doing this for netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(). Fix this by taking the instance lock using netdev_get_by_index_lock(). Extended the instance lock section to include attaching a memory provider. Could not move io_zcrx_create_area() outside, since the dmabuf codepath IORING_ZCRX_AREA_DMABUF requires ifq->dev. Fixes: 59b8b32ac8d4 ("io_uring/zcrx: add support for custom DMA devices") Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk> --- io_uring/zcrx.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/io_uring/zcrx.c b/io_uring/zcrx.c index a816f5902091..5599883f8941 100644 --- a/io_uring/zcrx.c +++ b/io_uring/zcrx.c @@ -599,27 +599,28 @@ int io_register_zcrx_ifq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, if (ret) goto err; - ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx, - &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); + ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx); if (!ifq->netdev) { ret = -ENODEV; - goto err; + goto netdev_unlock; } ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq); if (!ifq->dev) { ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; - goto err; + goto netdev_unlock; } + netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); get_device(ifq->dev); ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area); if (ret) - goto err; + goto netdev_unlock; mp_param.mp_ops = &io_uring_pp_zc_ops; mp_param.mp_priv = ifq; - ret = net_mp_open_rxq(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq, &mp_param); + ret = __net_mp_open_rxq(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq, &mp_param, NULL); + netdev_unlock(ifq->netdev); if (ret) goto err; ifq->if_rxq = reg.if_rxq; @@ -640,6 +641,8 @@ int io_register_zcrx_ifq(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, goto err; } return 0; +netdev_unlock: + netdev_unlock(ifq->netdev); err: scoped_guard(mutex, &ctx->mmap_lock) xa_erase(&ctx->zcrx_ctxs, id); -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock 2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei @ 2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-10-29 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Wei Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:54 -0700 David Wei wrote: > + ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx); > if (!ifq->netdev) { > ret = -ENODEV; > - goto err; > + goto netdev_unlock; > } > > ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq); > if (!ifq->dev) { > ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > - goto err; > + goto netdev_unlock; > } > + netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); > get_device(ifq->dev); > > ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area); > if (ret) > - goto err; > + goto netdev_unlock; Without looking at larger context this looks sus. You're jumping to the same label before and after you took the ref on the netdev.. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock 2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski @ 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: David Wei @ 2025-10-30 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: io-uring, netdev, Jens Axboe, Pavel Begunkov, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman On 2025-10-29 16:54, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:16:54 -0700 David Wei wrote: >> + ifq->netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(current->nsproxy->net_ns, reg.if_idx); >> if (!ifq->netdev) { >> ret = -ENODEV; >> - goto err; >> + goto netdev_unlock; >> } >> >> ifq->dev = netdev_queue_get_dma_dev(ifq->netdev, reg.if_rxq); >> if (!ifq->dev) { >> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; >> - goto err; >> + goto netdev_unlock; >> } >> + netdev_hold(ifq->netdev, &ifq->netdev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); >> get_device(ifq->dev); >> >> ret = io_zcrx_create_area(ifq, &area); >> if (ret) >> - goto err; >> + goto netdev_unlock; > > Without looking at larger context this looks sus. > You're jumping to the same label before and after you took the ref on > the netdev.. Sorry you're right, and actually io_zcrx_ifq_free() does netdev_put() unconditionally. I'll correct this in v3. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-30 1:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-10-29 23:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei 2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: export netdev_get_by_index_lock() David Wei 2025-10-29 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei 2025-10-29 23:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: io_uring/zcrx: call netdev_queue_get_dma_dev() under instance lock David Wei 2025-10-29 23:54 ` Jakub Kicinski 2025-10-30 1:09 ` David Wei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox