From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
Akilesh Kailash <akailash@google.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: bpf: extend io_uring with bpf struct_ops
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 03:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511080257.ZRnK6f2W-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104162123.1086035-4-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Hi Ming,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20251104]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/net bpf-next/master bpf/master linus/master v6.18-rc4 v6.18-rc3 v6.18-rc2 v6.18-rc4]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/io_uring-prepare-for-extending-io_uring-with-bpf/20251105-002757
base: next-20251104
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251104162123.1086035-4-ming.lei%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: bpf: extend io_uring with bpf struct_ops
config: parisc-randconfig-r121-20251107 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251108/202511080257.ZRnK6f2W-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251108/202511080257.ZRnK6f2W-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511080257.ZRnK6f2W-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
io_uring/bpf.c: In function 'uring_bpf_ops_is_valid_access':
>> io_uring/bpf.c:117:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access'; did you mean 'bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access
In file included from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7,
from io_uring/bpf.c:9:
io_uring/bpf.c: In function 'io_bpf_init':
include/linux/bpf.h:2044:50: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
#define register_bpf_struct_ops(st_ops, type) ({ (void *)(st_ops); 0; })
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
io_uring/bpf.c:303:8: note: in expansion of macro 'register_bpf_struct_ops'
err = register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_uring_bpf_ops, uring_bpf_ops);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:
In function 'io_kiocb_cmd_sz_check',
inlined from 'io_uring_bpf_prep' at io_uring/bpf.c:41:32:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_513' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:584:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/io_uring_types.h:655:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
BUILD_BUG_ON(cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data));
^~~~~~~~~~~~
In function 'io_kiocb_cmd_sz_check',
inlined from '__io_uring_bpf_issue.isra.4' at io_uring/bpf.c:58:32,
inlined from 'io_uring_bpf_issue' at io_uring/bpf.c:72:9:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_513' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:584:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/io_uring_types.h:655:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
BUILD_BUG_ON(cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data));
^~~~~~~~~~~~
In function 'io_kiocb_cmd_sz_check',
inlined from '__io_uring_bpf_issue.isra.4' at io_uring/bpf.c:58:32,
inlined from 'io_uring_bpf_issue' at io_uring/bpf.c:77:9:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_513' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:584:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/io_uring_types.h:655:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
BUILD_BUG_ON(cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data));
^~~~~~~~~~~~
In function 'io_kiocb_cmd_sz_check',
inlined from 'io_uring_bpf_fail' at io_uring/bpf.c:82:32:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_513' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:584:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
prefix ## suffix(); \
^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/io_uring_types.h:655:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
BUILD_BUG_ON(cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data));
^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/io_uring_types.h: In function 'io_uring_bpf_cleanup':
include/linux/compiler_types.h:603:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_513' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: cmd_sz > sizeof(struct io_cmd_data)
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:584:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
vim +117 io_uring/bpf.c
111
112 static bool uring_bpf_ops_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
113 enum bpf_access_type type,
114 const struct bpf_prog *prog,
115 struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
116 {
> 117 return bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
118 }
119
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 16:21 [PATCH 0/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_BPF for extending io_uring Ming Lei
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] io_uring: prepare for extending io_uring with bpf Ming Lei
2025-12-31 1:13 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 9:33 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] io_uring: bpf: add io_uring_ctx setup for BPF into one list Ming Lei
2025-12-31 1:13 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 9:49 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 16:19 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: bpf: extend io_uring with bpf struct_ops Ming Lei
2025-11-07 19:02 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-11-08 6:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-13 10:32 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-11-13 10:59 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-13 11:19 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-11-14 3:00 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-08 22:45 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-09 3:08 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-10 16:11 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-19 14:39 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-11-20 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-20 1:51 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 1:19 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 16:48 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] io_uring: bpf: add buffer support for IORING_OP_BPF Ming Lei
2025-11-13 10:42 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-11-13 11:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-13 11:25 ` Stefan Metzmacher
2025-12-31 1:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-31 11:02 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-31 17:02 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] io_uring: bpf: add io_uring_bpf_req_memcpy() kfunc Ming Lei
2025-11-07 18:51 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-31 1:42 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-05 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] io_uring: add IORING_OP_BPF for extending io_uring Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-05 15:57 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-06 16:03 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-07 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-11 14:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-11-13 4:18 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-19 19:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511080257.ZRnK6f2W-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akailash@google.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox