From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
mjguzik@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
audit@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 09/13] do_readlinkat(): import pathname only once
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2025 06:37:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251109063745.2089578-10-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251109063745.2089578-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Take getname_flags() and putname() outside of retry loop.
Since getname_flags() is the only thing that cares about LOOKUP_EMPTY,
don't bother with setting LOOKUP_EMPTY in lookup_flags - just pass it
to getname_flags() and be done with that.
The things could be further simplified by use of cleanup.h stuff, but
let's not clutter the patch with that.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/stat.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c
index 6c79661e1b96..ee9ae2c3273a 100644
--- a/fs/stat.c
+++ b/fs/stat.c
@@ -566,13 +566,13 @@ static int do_readlinkat(int dfd, const char __user *pathname,
struct path path;
struct filename *name;
int error;
- unsigned int lookup_flags = LOOKUP_EMPTY;
+ unsigned int lookup_flags = 0;
if (bufsiz <= 0)
return -EINVAL;
+ name = getname_flags(pathname, LOOKUP_EMPTY);
retry:
- name = getname_flags(pathname, lookup_flags);
error = filename_lookup(dfd, name, lookup_flags, &path, NULL);
if (unlikely(error)) {
putname(name);
@@ -593,11 +593,11 @@ static int do_readlinkat(int dfd, const char __user *pathname,
error = (name->name[0] == '\0') ? -ENOENT : -EINVAL;
}
path_put(&path);
- putname(name);
if (retry_estale(error, lookup_flags)) {
lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_REVAL;
goto retry;
}
+ putname(name);
return error;
}
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-09 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-09 6:37 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] io_uring, struct filename and audit Al Viro
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13] do_faccessat(): import pathname only once Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:11 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13] do_fchmodat(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:12 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13] do_fchownat(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:13 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13] do_utimes_path(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:15 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13] chdir(2): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:16 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] chroot(2): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] user_statfs(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] do_sys_truncate(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-11-13 10:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] do_readlinkat(): " Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] get rid of audit_reusename() Al Viro
2025-11-09 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 19:55 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:18 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 22:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:33 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 22:39 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-10 5:17 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-10 19:58 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-11 1:16 ` Al Viro
2025-11-12 9:26 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-10 6:05 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 6:36 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-10 23:13 ` Paul Moore
2025-11-11 0:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-11-13 10:29 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] allow incomplete imports of filenames Al Viro
2025-11-11 0:45 ` Paul Moore
2025-11-11 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-19 1:12 ` Al Viro
2025-11-19 1:14 ` Al Viro
2025-11-19 5:41 ` Al Viro
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] fs: touch up predicts in putname() Al Viro
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] struct filename ->refcnt doesn't need to be atomic Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251109063745.2089578-10-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox