From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>,
Martin Brandenburg <martin@omnibond.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files v3
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 07:09:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251217061015.923954-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
Hi all,
commit 66fa3cedf16a ("fs: Add async write file modification handling.")
effectively disabled IOCB_NOWAIT writes as timestamp updates currently
always require blocking, and the modern timestamp resolution means we
always update timestamps. This leads to a lot of context switches from
applications using io_uring to submit file writes, making it often worse
than using the legacy aio code that is not using IOCB_NOWAIT.
This series allows non-blocking updates for lazytime if the file system
supports it, and adds that support for XFS.
Changes since v2:
- drop patches merged upstream
- adjust for the inode state accesors
- keep a check in __writeback_single_inode instead of exercising
potentially undefined behavior
- more spelling fixes
Changes since v1:
- more regular numbering of the S_* flags
- fix XFS to actually not block
- don't ignore the generic_update_time return value in
file_update_time_flags
- fix the sync_lazytime return value
- fix an out of data comment in btrfs
- fix a race that would update i_version before returning -EAGAIN in XFS
Diffstat:
Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst | 2
Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 6 ++
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 11 +++-
fs/fat/misc.c | 3 +
fs/fs-writeback.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++---
fs/gfs2/inode.c | 6 +-
fs/inode.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
fs/internal.h | 3 -
fs/nfs/inode.c | 4 -
fs/orangefs/inode.c | 8 ++-
fs/overlayfs/inode.c | 3 +
fs/sync.c | 4 -
fs/ubifs/file.c | 11 ++--
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 35 ++++++++++++-
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 29 -----------
include/linux/fs.h | 19 ++++---
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 6 --
17 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-17 6:09 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 01/10] fs: remove inode_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] fs: allow error returns from generic_update_time Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 03/10] fs: exit early in generic_update_time when there is no work Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: factor out a mark_inode_dirty_time helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] fs: allow error returns from inode_update_timestamps Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 12:23 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] fs: factor out a sync_lazytime helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 12:26 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] fs: add a ->sync_lazytime method Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 12:30 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-18 6:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] fs: add support for non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 12:42 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-18 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-19 15:12 ` Jan Kara
2025-12-22 23:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: implement ->sync_lazytime Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-17 6:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: enable non-blocking timestamp updates Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251217061015.923954-1-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hubcap@omnibond.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@omnibond.com \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox