From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: bschubert@ddn.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, csander@purestorage.com,
xiaobing.li@samsung.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/25] io_uring/rsrc: split io_buffer_register_request() logic
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:33:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218083319.3485503-22-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218083319.3485503-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Split the main initialization logic in io_buffer_register_request() into
a helper function.
This is a preparatory patch for supporting kernel-populated buffers in
fuse io-uring, which will be reusing this logic.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
---
io_uring/rsrc.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
index b25b418e5c11..5fe2695dafb6 100644
--- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
+++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
@@ -936,67 +936,86 @@ int io_sqe_buffers_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
return ret;
}
-int io_buffer_register_request(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
- void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
- unsigned int issue_flags)
+static struct io_mapped_ubuf *io_kernel_buffer_init(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ unsigned int nr_bvecs,
+ unsigned int total_bytes,
+ u8 dir,
+ void (*release)(void *),
+ void *priv,
+ unsigned int index)
{
- struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->ctx;
struct io_rsrc_data *data = &ctx->buf_table;
- struct req_iterator rq_iter;
struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
struct io_rsrc_node *node;
- struct bio_vec bv;
- unsigned int nr_bvecs = 0;
- int ret = 0;
- io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
- if (index >= data->nr) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (index >= data->nr)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
index = array_index_nospec(index, data->nr);
- if (data->nodes[index]) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (data->nodes[index])
+ return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
node = io_rsrc_node_alloc(ctx, IORING_RSRC_BUFFER);
- if (!node) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ if (!node)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- /*
- * blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() may overestimate the number of bvecs
- * but avoids needing to iterate over the bvecs
- */
- imu = io_alloc_imu(ctx, blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq));
+ imu = io_alloc_imu(ctx, nr_bvecs);
if (!imu) {
kfree(node);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto unlock;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
imu->ubuf = 0;
- imu->len = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
+ imu->len = total_bytes;
imu->acct_pages = 0;
imu->folio_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
+ imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
imu->release = release;
- imu->priv = rq;
+ imu->priv = priv;
imu->is_kbuf = true;
- imu->dir = 1 << rq_data_dir(rq);
+ imu->dir = 1 << dir;
+ node->buf = imu;
+ data->nodes[index] = node;
+
+ return imu;
+}
+
+int io_buffer_register_request(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
+ void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
+ unsigned int issue_flags)
+{
+ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->ctx;
+ struct req_iterator rq_iter;
+ struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
+ struct bio_vec bv;
+ unsigned int nr_bvecs;
+ unsigned int total_bytes;
+
+ /*
+ * blk_rq_nr_phys_segments() may overestimate the number of bvecs
+ * but avoids needing to iterate over the bvecs
+ */
+ nr_bvecs = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
+ total_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
+
+ io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
+
+ imu = io_kernel_buffer_init(ctx, nr_bvecs, total_bytes, rq_data_dir(rq),
+ release, rq, index);
+ if (IS_ERR(imu)) {
+ io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
+ return PTR_ERR(imu);
+ }
+
+ nr_bvecs = 0;
rq_for_each_bvec(bv, rq, rq_iter)
imu->bvec[nr_bvecs++] = bv;
imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
- node->buf = imu;
- data->nodes[index] = node;
-unlock:
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_buffer_register_request);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 8:32 [PATCH v2 00/25] fuse/io-uring: add kernel-managed buffer rings and zero-copy Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] io_uring/kbuf: refactor io_buf_pbuf_register() logic into generic helpers Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] io_uring/kbuf: rename io_unregister_pbuf_ring() to io_unregister_buf_ring() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] io_uring/kbuf: add support for kernel-managed buffer rings Joanne Koong
2025-12-21 12:24 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-18 8:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] io_uring/kbuf: add mmap " Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] io_uring/kbuf: support kernel-managed buffer rings in buffer selection Joanne Koong
2025-12-21 13:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] io_uring/kbuf: add buffer ring pinning/unpinning Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 14:21 ` Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] io_uring/kbuf: add recycling for kernel managed buffer rings Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] io_uring: add io_uring_cmd_fixed_index_get() and io_uring_cmd_fixed_index_put() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] io_uring/kbuf: add io_uring_cmd_is_kmbuf_ring() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] io_uring/kbuf: export io_ring_buffer_select() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] io_uring/kbuf: return buffer id in buffer selection Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] io_uring/cmd: set selected buffer index in __io_uring_cmd_done() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] fuse: refactor io-uring logic for getting next fuse request Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] fuse: refactor io-uring header copying to ring Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] fuse: refactor io-uring header copying from ring Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] fuse: use enum types for header copying Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] fuse: refactor setting up copy state for payload copying Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] fuse: support buffer copying for kernel addresses Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] fuse: add io-uring kernel-managed buffer ring Joanne Koong
2025-12-20 22:45 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 2:10 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 17:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] io_uring/rsrc: rename io_buffer_register_bvec()/io_buffer_unregister_bvec() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] io_uring/rsrc: Allow buffer release callback to be optional Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] io_uring/rsrc: add io_buffer_register_bvec() Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] fuse: add zero-copy over io-uring Joanne Koong
2025-12-18 8:33 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] docs: fuse: add io-uring bufring and zero-copy documentation Joanne Koong
2025-12-21 2:28 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251218083319.3485503-22-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=xiaobing.li@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox