public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: krisman@suse.de, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/register: allow original task restrictions owner to unregister
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 2026 11:48:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260109185155.88150-4-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109185155.88150-1-axboe@kernel.dk>

Currently any attempt to register a set of task restrictions if an
existing set exists will fail with -EPERM. But it is feasible to let the
original creator/owner performance this operation. Either to remove
restrictions entirely, or to replace them with a new set.

If an existing set exists and NULL is passed for the new set, the
current set is unregistered. If an existing set exists and a new set is
supplied, the old set is dropped and replaced with the new one.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 include/linux/io_uring_types.h |  1 +
 io_uring/register.c            | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 196f41ec6d60..1ff7817b3535 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct io_rings {
 struct io_restriction {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(register_op, IORING_REGISTER_LAST);
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(sqe_op, IORING_OP_LAST);
+	pid_t pid;
 	refcount_t refs;
 	u8 sqe_flags_allowed;
 	u8 sqe_flags_required;
diff --git a/io_uring/register.c b/io_uring/register.c
index 552b22f6b2dc..c8b8a9edbc65 100644
--- a/io_uring/register.c
+++ b/io_uring/register.c
@@ -189,12 +189,19 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args)
 {
 	struct io_uring_task_restriction __user *ures = arg;
 	struct io_uring_task_restriction tres;
-	struct io_restriction *res;
+	struct io_restriction *old_res, *res;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (nr_args != 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	res = current->io_uring_restrict;
+	if (!ures) {
+		if (!res)
+			return -EFAULT;
+		goto drop_set;
+	}
+
 	if (copy_from_user(&tres, arg, sizeof(tres)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
@@ -207,13 +214,27 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args)
 	 * Disallow if task already has registered restrictions, and we're
 	 * not passing in further restrictions to add to an existing set.
 	 */
-	if (current->io_uring_restrict &&
-	    !(tres.flags & IORING_REG_RESTRICTIONS_MASK))
-		return -EPERM;
+	old_res = NULL;
+	if (res && !(tres.flags & IORING_REG_RESTRICTIONS_MASK)) {
+		/* Not owner, may only append further restrictions */
+drop_set:
+		if (res->pid != current->pid)
+			return -EPERM;
+		/* Old set to be put later if we succeed */
+		old_res = res;
+		/* No new mask supplied, we're done */
+		if (!ures) {
+			ret = 0;
+			current->io_uring_restrict = NULL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
 
 	res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!res)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!res) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Can only be set if we're MASK'ing in more restrictions. If so,
@@ -226,14 +247,22 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args)
 				    tres.flags & IORING_REG_RESTRICTIONS_MASK);
 	if (ret) {
 		kfree(res);
-		return ret;
+		goto out;
 	}
 	if (current->io_uring_restrict &&
 	    refcount_dec_and_test(&current->io_uring_restrict->refs))
 		kfree(current->io_uring_restrict);
+	res->pid = current->pid;
 	refcount_set(&res->refs, 1);
 	current->io_uring_restrict = res;
-	return 0;
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	if (ret) {
+		if (old_res)
+			current->io_uring_restrict = old_res;
+	} else if (old_res && refcount_dec_and_test(&old_res->refs))
+		kfree(old_res);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int io_register_enable_rings(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-09 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09 18:48 [PATCHSET RFC v2 0/3] Per-task io_uring opcode restrictions Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: allow registration of per-task restrictions Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring/register: add MASK support for task filter set Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 18:48 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-01-13  0:10   ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/register: allow original task restrictions owner to unregister Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-01-13 18:25     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260109185155.88150-4-axboe@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox