From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: krisman@suse.de, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/register: allow original task restrictions owner to unregister
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 11:48:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260109185155.88150-4-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109185155.88150-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
Currently any attempt to register a set of task restrictions if an
existing set exists will fail with -EPERM. But it is feasible to let the
original creator/owner performance this operation. Either to remove
restrictions entirely, or to replace them with a new set.
If an existing set exists and NULL is passed for the new set, the
current set is unregistered. If an existing set exists and a new set is
supplied, the old set is dropped and replaced with the new one.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 1 +
io_uring/register.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 196f41ec6d60..1ff7817b3535 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ struct io_rings {
struct io_restriction {
DECLARE_BITMAP(register_op, IORING_REGISTER_LAST);
DECLARE_BITMAP(sqe_op, IORING_OP_LAST);
+ pid_t pid;
refcount_t refs;
u8 sqe_flags_allowed;
u8 sqe_flags_required;
diff --git a/io_uring/register.c b/io_uring/register.c
index 552b22f6b2dc..c8b8a9edbc65 100644
--- a/io_uring/register.c
+++ b/io_uring/register.c
@@ -189,12 +189,19 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args)
{
struct io_uring_task_restriction __user *ures = arg;
struct io_uring_task_restriction tres;
- struct io_restriction *res;
+ struct io_restriction *old_res, *res;
int ret;
if (nr_args != 1)
return -EINVAL;
+ res = current->io_uring_restrict;
+ if (!ures) {
+ if (!res)
+ return -EFAULT;
+ goto drop_set;
+ }
+
if (copy_from_user(&tres, arg, sizeof(tres)))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -207,13 +214,27 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args)
* Disallow if task already has registered restrictions, and we're
* not passing in further restrictions to add to an existing set.
*/
- if (current->io_uring_restrict &&
- !(tres.flags & IORING_REG_RESTRICTIONS_MASK))
- return -EPERM;
+ old_res = NULL;
+ if (res && !(tres.flags & IORING_REG_RESTRICTIONS_MASK)) {
+ /* Not owner, may only append further restrictions */
+drop_set:
+ if (res->pid != current->pid)
+ return -EPERM;
+ /* Old set to be put later if we succeed */
+ old_res = res;
+ /* No new mask supplied, we're done */
+ if (!ures) {
+ ret = 0;
+ current->io_uring_restrict = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!res)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!res) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
/*
* Can only be set if we're MASK'ing in more restrictions. If so,
@@ -226,14 +247,22 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args)
tres.flags & IORING_REG_RESTRICTIONS_MASK);
if (ret) {
kfree(res);
- return ret;
+ goto out;
}
if (current->io_uring_restrict &&
refcount_dec_and_test(¤t->io_uring_restrict->refs))
kfree(current->io_uring_restrict);
+ res->pid = current->pid;
refcount_set(&res->refs, 1);
current->io_uring_restrict = res;
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+out:
+ if (ret) {
+ if (old_res)
+ current->io_uring_restrict = old_res;
+ } else if (old_res && refcount_dec_and_test(&old_res->refs))
+ kfree(old_res);
+ return ret;
}
static int io_register_enable_rings(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 18:48 [PATCHSET RFC v2 0/3] Per-task io_uring opcode restrictions Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: allow registration of per-task restrictions Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring/register: add MASK support for task filter set Jens Axboe
2026-01-09 18:48 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-01-13 0:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring/register: allow original task restrictions owner to unregister Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-01-13 18:25 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260109185155.88150-4-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox