From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A5452222C4; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768224138; cv=none; b=t1Xg8YYG6z6x2lskhqKVauWy/jezXctUPXfOev0+TPTqN2WcxaXh3+GyBw2PTjiK4M32+ujdyuTaUB0M2VEqH0oJOD4/gpR+mt4vL0WxEbgluluqBG0cvIb/CycVkFyq/una4HhDKJ9kJqrF7rnnSOrLjKSV+5oDmnj/eb+QtPU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768224138; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BDUIckWVUD1RagFJ5xtI1INGnjOo0Mtn45L5+aqLxUo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nxcgSYj0Psp8X01sLLTBGqY0ksQ1xEwHLmTrvsHZ5lgE6pbzyqc8YtyIH4RwBvuvfD4BEdd2HimhtT5Gepw6DKHoiXDgTNVTAqdEeywREDVQWM4hMhFy2L6k8x70NiDZGkeA4qO2SWHQYc+ebg+gtTD2rKm6J65eqJj9iMl1K60= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LNIEc6Wc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LNIEc6Wc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D36AC19422; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:22:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768224137; bh=BDUIckWVUD1RagFJ5xtI1INGnjOo0Mtn45L5+aqLxUo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LNIEc6WcDx/szM8jktnG2voPpypdHDEA3wNwBsS5urMtvVE/RJR4Qx+GlS2vTfgdL z3g0WuJBsYVMpOlpti9ggZFdF2XlmmEqFtVAtthTSnvQDbiaSwRRshgiK5wt+Hv4Op gMgXisTKe9rQ2wpuEf56WS8TQjShDXGVrTVnkYWTpnkz2yPcB21TzwF7D+jAypeJde guQZ9tsxbFISMUtu+DdRRSEp33HOe+1UGmKeveLm1+VzC3l5QaOfFQRPNzRuHAJZ4p t7onerDFPgLsmiZZzPb2urdwXIucijdwljWTYh6SIa9RV9g8WRyD6sTf8WYWuDcdOt j4TC128wA5czQ== Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:22:11 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Al Viro , David Sterba , Jan Kara , Mike Marshall , Martin Brandenburg , Carlos Maiolino , Stefan Roesch , Jeff Layton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: re-enable IOCB_NOWAIT writes to files v4 Message-ID: <20260112-canceln-skript-95f066b9fcc1@brauner> References: <20251223003756.409543-1-hch@lst.de> <20251224-zusah-emporsteigen-764a9185a0a1@brauner> <20260106062409.GA16998@lst.de> <20260106-bequem-albatros-3c747261974f@brauner> <20260107073247.GA17448@lst.de> <20260112-adelstitel-propaganda-ef80e3d2f8ca@brauner> <20260112100558.GA7670@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260112100558.GA7670@lst.de> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:04:17AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 08:32:47AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > Umm, as in my self reply just before heading out for vacation, Julia > > > > > found issues in it using static type checking tools. I have a new > > > > > version that fixes that and sorts out the S_* mess. So please drop > > > > > it again for now, I'll resend the fixed version ASAP. > > > > > > > > It has never been pushed nor applied as I saw your mail right before all > > > > of that. > > > > > > Thanks. But maybe you can fix up the applied messages to be more > > > specific? We had various issues in the past with them, where they > > > were sent, but things did not end up in the tree for various reasons. > > > > What are you thinking of exactly? > > Only send out the applied message when something is actually pushed > to the public tree? When that happens it usually means that it's still waiting on tests. I can pay more attention to this but don't expect it to be perfect in all cases.