public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, dw@davidwei.uk,
	jdamato@fastly.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: rework large chunks test to use common setup
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:13:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260227171305.2848240-3-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260227171305.2848240-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Commit a32bb32d0193 ("selftests: iou-zcrx: test large chunk sizes")
and commit de7c600e2d5b ("selftests/net: parametrise iou-zcrx.py with
ksft_variants") landed at similar time. The large chunks test was
actually not included in the list of tests, so it never run.
We haven't noticed that it uses the old-style helpers
(_get_combined_channels, _get_current_settings, _set_flow_rule)
that were removed by the other commit.

Rework test_zcrx_large_chunks to reuse the single() setup function
and add it to the ksft_run cases list so it actually gets executed.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: shuah@kernel.org
CC: dw@davidwei.uk
CC: jdamato@fastly.com
CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
---
 .../selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py      | 31 ++++---------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py
index c27c2064701d..1649c23e05e2 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.py
@@ -135,36 +135,16 @@ SKIP_CODE = 42
 
     cfg.require_ipver('6')
 
-    combined_chans = _get_combined_channels(cfg)
-    if combined_chans < 2:
-        raise KsftSkipEx('at least 2 combined channels required')
-    (rx_ring, hds_thresh) = _get_current_settings(cfg)
-    port = rand_port()
-
-    ethtool(f"-G {cfg.ifname} tcp-data-split on")
-    defer(ethtool, f"-G {cfg.ifname} tcp-data-split auto")
-
-    ethtool(f"-G {cfg.ifname} hds-thresh 0")
-    defer(ethtool, f"-G {cfg.ifname} hds-thresh {hds_thresh}")
-
-    ethtool(f"-G {cfg.ifname} rx 64")
-    defer(ethtool, f"-G {cfg.ifname} rx {rx_ring}")
-
-    ethtool(f"-X {cfg.ifname} equal {combined_chans - 1}")
-    defer(ethtool, f"-X {cfg.ifname} default")
-
-    flow_rule_id = _set_flow_rule(cfg, port, combined_chans - 1)
-    defer(ethtool, f"-N {cfg.ifname} delete {flow_rule_id}")
-
-    rx_cmd = f"{cfg.bin_local} -s -p {port} -i {cfg.ifname} -q {combined_chans - 1} -x 2"
-    tx_cmd = f"{cfg.bin_remote} -c -h {cfg.addr_v['6']} -p {port} -l 12840"
+    single(cfg)
+    rx_cmd = f"{cfg.bin_local} -s -p {cfg.port} -i {cfg.ifname} -q {cfg.target} -x 2"
+    tx_cmd = f"{cfg.bin_remote} -c -h {cfg.addr_v['6']} -p {cfg.port} -l 12840"
 
     probe = cmd(rx_cmd + " -d", fail=False)
     if probe.ret == SKIP_CODE:
         raise KsftSkipEx(probe.stdout)
 
     with bkg(rx_cmd, exit_wait=True):
-        wait_port_listen(port, proto="tcp")
+        wait_port_listen(cfg.port, proto="tcp")
         cmd(tx_cmd, host=cfg.remote)
 
 
@@ -176,7 +156,8 @@ SKIP_CODE = 42
         cfg.ethnl = EthtoolFamily()
         cfg.netnl = NetdevFamily()
         cfg.port = rand_port()
-        ksft_run(globs=globals(), cases=[test_zcrx, test_zcrx_oneshot], args=(cfg, ))
+        ksft_run(globs=globals(), cases=[test_zcrx, test_zcrx_oneshot,
+                                        test_zcrx_large_chunks], args=(cfg, ))
     ksft_exit()
 
 
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-27 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-27 17:13 [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: improve stability and make the large chunk test work Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-27 17:13 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: wait for memory provider cleanup Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-27 17:13 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-02-27 17:13 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: drv-net: iou-zcrx: allocate hugepages for large chunks test Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260227171305.2848240-3-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox