From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 06/15] io_uring: keep the tctx nodes on a list
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:40:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911154148.644489-7-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911154148.644489-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
tctx->xa is indexed by the ring pointer, which makes it a deep and
sparse xarray. Iterating it with xa_for_each() is expensive, 12 usec
for a single entry in testing. Keep the nodes on a list as well and
walk that instead, lookups by ring stay in the xarray.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 2 ++
io_uring/tctx.c | 10 ++++++----
io_uring/tctx.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 39629ee77b91..4af3d579ead6 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ struct io_uring_task {
struct file *registered_rings[IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX];
struct xarray xa;
+ /* the nodes in ->xa, for walking without the xarray lookup cost */
+ struct list_head node_list;
struct wait_queue_head wait;
atomic_t in_cancel;
atomic_t inflight_tracked;
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c
index 466b7300e208..737dfad4a976 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.c
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ __cold struct io_uring_task *io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *tas
tctx->task = task;
xa_init(&tctx->xa);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tctx->node_list);
init_waitqueue_head(&tctx->wait);
atomic_set(&tctx->in_cancel, 0);
atomic_set(&tctx->inflight_tracked, 0);
@@ -135,6 +136,7 @@ static int io_tctx_install_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
kfree(node);
return ret;
}
+ list_add(&node->tctx_link, &tctx->node_list);
mutex_lock(&ctx->tctx_lock);
list_add(&node->ctx_node, &ctx->tctx_list);
@@ -227,6 +229,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_del_tctx_node(unsigned long index)
WARN_ON_ONCE(current != node->task);
WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&node->ctx_node));
+ list_del(&node->tctx_link);
mutex_lock(&node->ctx->tctx_lock);
list_del(&node->ctx_node);
@@ -243,11 +246,10 @@ __cold void io_uring_del_tctx_node(unsigned long index)
__cold void io_uring_clean_tctx(struct io_uring_task *tctx)
{
struct io_wq *wq = tctx->io_wq;
- struct io_tctx_node *node;
- unsigned long index;
+ struct io_tctx_node *node, *tmp;
- xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node) {
- io_uring_del_tctx_node(index);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(node, tmp, &tctx->node_list, tctx_link) {
+ io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)node->ctx);
cond_resched();
}
if (wq) {
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.h b/io_uring/tctx.h
index 76ad1ad4594e..9a139816ce4f 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.h
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
struct io_tctx_node {
struct list_head ctx_node;
+ /* on tctx->node_list, only ever touched by the owning task */
+ struct list_head tctx_link;
struct task_struct *task;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
};
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 15:40 [RFC PATCH 00/15] io_uring: thread identity handoff for blocking inline issue Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 01/15] kernel: add thread identity handoff Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched: call into io_uring when a PF_IO_HANDOFF task blocks Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm64: implement thread identity handoff Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86: " Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 05/15] io_uring/kbuf: use io_ring_submit_unlock() helper Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 07/15] io_uring: add uring_lock section depth tracking and blockable opdef flag Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 08/15] io_uring: split io_uring_enter() and io_submit_sqes() into helpers Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 09/15] io_uring: keep the submission plug on the io_submit_sqes() stack Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] io-wq: support handing a task identity to an idle worker Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] io_uring: enable handing submitter identity to an io-wq worker Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 12/15] io_uring: defer the identity migration to the end of the submission Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 13/15] io_uring: issue blockable requests inline in blocking mode Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 14/15] io_uring: add tracepoints for the handoff operation Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 15/15] io_uring: issue IOSQE_ASYNC requests inline when a handoff is possible Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 17:33 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] io_uring: thread identity handoff for blocking inline issue Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-09-11 17:51 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911154148.644489-7-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox