From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EB6C77B7C for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 19:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229681AbjEDThw (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2023 15:37:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbjEDThv (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2023 15:37:51 -0400 Received: from mail.reece.sx (phobos.reece.sx [51.68.206.218]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF20A5FF9 for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 12:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.2.15] (unknown [192.168.144.2]) by mail.reece.sx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FEE54FA039A; Thu, 4 May 2023 19:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <204843b9-9758-c66f-b563-33865a8696bb@reece.sx> Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 20:37:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1 Subject: Re: io_uring is a regression over 16 year old aio/io_submit, 2+ decades of Microsoft NT, and *BSD circa 1997-2001 To: Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org References: <23940f55-9905-4e4b-48dc-31d309c9e363@reece.sx> <6171ec94-150c-e277-d495-aaa3e1d694f7@kernel.dk> <9e050e00-d50d-04df-7372-34f0f5e404a5@reece.sx> <818a2af6-673a-38e6-d8ad-647e749d0a29@kernel.dk> From: Reece In-Reply-To: <818a2af6-673a-38e6-d8ad-647e749d0a29@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Does this mean you stopped after the part where I cited 3 APIs including an old Linux interface (16+ years old), FreeBSD's implementation, and a Windows NT interface that all predate a hypothetical 14 year old? I guess this means modern Linux is less mature than both its' former -16 year old self and a hypothetical 14 year old. On 04/05/2023 20:31, Jens Axboe wrote: > Maybe less anonymous then, but the tone is still way out of line and > not acceptable. If you don't want to be perceived as an angry 14 year > old, I suggest you rewrite your email and try again. I stopped half way > through that steaming pile of words. > > > On 5/4/23 1:29 PM, Reece wrote: >> what are you talking about? i literally cc'd you alongside the mailing list. how is an email alongside commits tied to my real legal name "anonymous" trolling? >> >> On 04/05/2023 20:27, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 5/4/23 1:20?PM, Reece wrote a pile of garbage. >>> >>> If you have constructive criticism, the list is open to discuss it. >>> Sending trolly garbage anonymously is, however, neither welcome nor a >>> productive approach. >>>