public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: John Garry <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Patch v9 00/10] block atomic writes
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:28:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 6/21/24 1:59 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 20/06/2024 22:23, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:53:49 +0000, John Garry wrote:
>>> This series introduces a proposal to implementing atomic writes in the
>>> kernel for torn-write protection.
>>>
>>> This series takes the approach of adding a new "atomic" flag to each of
>>> pwritev2() and iocb->ki_flags - RWF_ATOMIC and IOCB_ATOMIC, respectively.
>>> When set, these indicate that we want the write issued "atomically".
>>>
>>> [...]
>> Applied, thanks!
> 
> Thanks Jens.
> 
> JFYI, we will probably notice a trivial conflict in
> include/uapi/linux/stat.h when merging, as I fixed a comment there
> which went into v6.10-rc4 . To resolve, the version in this series can
> be used, as it also fixes that comment.

I did notice and resolved it when I merged it into my for-next branch.
And then was kind of annoyed when I noticed it was caused by a patch
from yourself as well, surely that should either have been part of the
series, just ignored for -git, or done after the fact. Kind of pointless
to cause conflicts with your own series right when it needs ready to go
into the for-next tree.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20 12:53 [Patch v9 00/10] block atomic writes John Garry
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 01/10] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer John Garry
2024-06-20 14:12   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 02/10] block: Generalize chunk_sectors support as boundary support John Garry
2024-06-20 14:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 03/10] fs: Initial atomic write support John Garry
2024-06-21  5:56   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 04/10] fs: Add initial atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2024-06-21  5:57   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 05/10] block: Add core atomic write support John Garry
2024-06-20 19:34   ` Keith Busch
2024-06-21  6:09   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-21  7:41     ` John Garry
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 06/10] block: Add atomic write support for statx John Garry
2024-06-20 19:46   ` Keith Busch
2024-06-21  6:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 07/10] block: Add fops atomic write support John Garry
2024-06-20 19:46   ` Keith Busch
2024-06-21  6:13   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-21 12:02     ` John Garry
2024-06-21 21:23       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21  9:41   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 08/10] scsi: sd: Atomic " John Garry
2024-06-21  6:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: " John Garry
2024-06-21  6:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-20 12:53 ` [Patch v9 10/10] nvme: " John Garry
2024-06-20 20:36   ` Keith Busch
2024-06-21  6:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-21  9:40   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-20 21:23 ` [Patch v9 00/10] block atomic writes Jens Axboe
2024-06-21  7:59   ` John Garry
2024-06-21 14:28     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-06-21 14:41       ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox