From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: net: fix bug of completing multishot accept twice
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:34:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 6/17/22 8:34 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
> On 6/17/22 22:23, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/17/22 8:12 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>>> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Now that we use centralized completion in io_issue_sqe, we should skip
>>> that for multishot accept requests since we complete them in the
>>> specific op function.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 34106529422e ("io_uring: never defer-complete multi-apoll")
>>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I retrieved the history:
>>>
>>> in 4e86a2c98013 ("io_uring: implement multishot mode for accept")
>>> we add the multishot accept, it repeatly completes cqe in io_accept()
>>> until get -EAGAIN [1], then it returns 0 to io_issue_sqe().
>>> io_issue_sqe() does nothing to it then.
>>>
>>> in 09eaa49e078c ("io_uring: handle completions in the core")
>>> we add __io_req_complete() for IOU_OK in io_issue_sqe(). This causes at
>>> [1], we do call __io_req_complete().But since IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER
>>> is set, it does nothing.
>>>
>>> in 34106529422e ("io_uring: never defer-complete multi-apoll")
>>> we remove IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER, but unluckily the multishot accept
>>> test is broken, we didn't find the error.
>>>
>>> So it just has infuence to for-5.20, I'll update the liburing test
>>> today.
>>
>> Do you mind if I fold this into:
>>
>> 09eaa49e078c ("io_uring: handle completions in the core")
>>
>> as I'm continually rebasing the 5.20 branch until 5.19 is fully sorted?
>>
>
> Please do, that is better.
Done, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-17 14:12 [PATCH] io_uring: net: fix bug of completing multishot accept twice Hao Xu
2022-06-17 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-17 14:34 ` Hao Xu
2022-06-17 14:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox