public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: split req init from submit
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:00:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 7/31/23 6:53?AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/28/23 21:14, Keith Busch wrote:
>> From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
>>
>> Split the req initialization and link handling from the submit. This
>> simplifies the submit path since everything that can fail is separate
>> from it, and makes it easier to create batched submissions later.
> 
> Keith, I don't think this prep patch does us any good, I'd rather
> shove the link assembling code further out of the common path. I like
> the first version more (see [1]). I'd suggest to merge it, and do
> cleaning up after.
> 
> I'll also say that IMHO the overhead is well justified. It's not only
> about having multiple nvmes, the problem slows down cases mixing storage
> with net and the rest of IO in a single ring.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/[email protected]/

The downside of that one, to me, is that it just serializes all of it
and we end up looping over the submission list twice. With alloc+init
split, at least we get some locality wins by grouping the setup side of
the requests.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-31 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28 20:14 [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: split req init from submit Keith Busch
2023-07-28 20:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: split req prep and submit loops Keith Busch
2023-07-28 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: set plug tags for same file Keith Busch
2023-07-31 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: split req init from submit Pavel Begunkov
2023-07-31 21:00   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-08-01 14:13     ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-08-01 15:17       ` Keith Busch
2023-08-01 16:05         ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox